• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜治疗结直肠癌伴肝转移的安全性和疗效评价。

Safety and efficacy evaluation of laparoscopy in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Jul;21(3 Suppl):27-32.

PMID:28745796
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety and efficacy of simultaneous completion of colorectal cancer resection and liver metastasis resection by total laparoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the observation group, 40 patients with colorectal cancer combined with liver metastasis (CRCLM) were selected to receive total laparoscopic surgery. At the same time, 40 cases were selected for laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer and hepatic resection as control group.

RESULTS

The outcomes of the two methods in the treatment of CRCLM were compared. The results showed that the difference in surgery time between the two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The blood loss, drainage tube retention time and anal exhaust recovery time in the observation group were significantly less than those in control group (p<0.05). No significant difference in completion rate was found between the two groups (p>0.05); the prevalence rate of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (p<0.05). No significant differences in the median survival period and the survival rate at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after surgery were found between the two groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of total laparoscopy in the treatment of CRCLM are not inferior to open surgery.

摘要

目的

研究完全腹腔镜下同时完成结直肠癌根治术和肝转移灶切除术的安全性和有效性。

方法

观察组中,选择 40 例结直肠癌合并肝转移(CRCLM)患者行完全腹腔镜手术。同时,选择 40 例行腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术和肝切除术的患者作为对照组。

结果

比较两种方法治疗 CRCLM 的效果,结果显示,两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);观察组术中出血量、引流管留置时间、肛门排气恢复时间均显著少于对照组(p<0.05);两组的根治率无显著差异(p>0.05);观察组并发症发生率显著低于对照组(p<0.05)。两组术后中位生存时间及术后 1 年、2 年、3 年的生存率差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

完全腹腔镜治疗 CRCLM 的效果并不逊于开腹手术。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy evaluation of laparoscopy in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis.腹腔镜治疗结直肠癌伴肝转移的安全性和疗效评价。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Jul;21(3 Suppl):27-32.
2
Long term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌合并同步肝转移的长期疗效比较。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 May 25.
3
Benefits of simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and liver metastases.同时进行腹腔镜下原发性结直肠癌和肝转移瘤切除术的益处。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Jan;7(1):31-7. doi: 10.1111/ases.12066. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
4
[A comparative study of total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted simultaneous resection for colorectal cancer liver metastasis].[全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助同期切除治疗结直肠癌肝转移的对比研究]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 May 23;42(5):413-418. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-112152-20190814-00526.
5
[Outcomes evaluation of laparoscopic radical coloproctectomy and hepatectomy for resectable colorectal cancer with liver metastases].腹腔镜根治性结肠直肠切除术联合肝切除术治疗可切除性结直肠癌肝转移的疗效评估
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Dec;52(12):919-23.
6
Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resection for patients with colorectal cancers: a comparative study.结直肠癌患者同期腹腔镜结直肠与肝脏切除术的疗效:一项对比研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Apr;24(4):229-35. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0475. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Short-term results of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: a comparative study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的短期疗效:一项对比研究
Am Surg. 2013 May;79(5):495-501.
8
Outcome of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的疗效
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Nov;83(11):847-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06270.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
9
Laparoscopic bowel resection in the setting of metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌患者的腹腔镜肠切除术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 May;15(5):1424-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9820-6. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
10
Laparoscopic Approach for Primary Colorectal Cancer Improves Outcome of Patients Undergoing Combined Open Hepatic Resection for Liver Metastases.腹腔镜入路治疗原发性结直肠癌可改善接受联合开放性肝切除术治疗肝转移患者的预后。
World J Surg. 2015 Oct;39(10):2573-82. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3127-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open resection of primary colorectal cancers and synchronous liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗原发性结直肠癌及同期肝转移的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr 5;38(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04375-z.
2
Surgical outcomes and quality of life between laparoscopic and open approach for hepatic hemangioma: A propensity score matching analysis.肝血管瘤腹腔镜与开放手术方式的手术结局及生活质量:倾向评分匹配分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14485. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014485.