Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) , Land and Water, Environmental Contaminant Mitigation and Technologies Research Program, Waite Road, Urrbrae, Adelaide Australia , 5064.
University of Florida , Soil and Water Sciences Department, 1692 McCarthy Drive, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Sep 5;51(17):9433-9445. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01094. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
Chronic exposure to environmental contaminants can induce heritable "transgenerational" modifications to organisms, potentially affecting future ecosystem health and functionality. Incorporating transgenerational epigenetic heritability into risk assessment procedures has been previously suggested. However, a critical review of existing literature yielded numerous studies claiming transgenerational impacts, with little compelling evidence. Therefore, contaminant-induced epigenetic inheritance may be less common than is reported in the literature. We identified a need for multigeneration epigenetic studies that extend beyond what could be deemed "direct exposure" to F1 and F2 gametes and also include subsequent multiple nonexposed generations to adequately evaluate transgenerational recovery times. Also, increased experimental replication is required to account for the highly variable nature of epigenetic responses and apparent irreproducibility of current studies. Further, epigenetic end points need to be correlated with observable detrimental organism changes before a need for risk management can be properly determined. We suggest that epigenetic-based contaminant studies include concentrations lower than current "EC" or "Lowest Observable Effect Concentrations" for the organism's most sensitive phenotypic end point, as higher concentrations are likely already regulated. Finally, we propose a regulatory framework and optimal experimental design that enables transgenerational epigenetic effects to be assessed and incorporated into conventional ecotoxicological testing.
慢性暴露于环境污染物会导致生物体产生可遗传的“跨代”修饰,可能会影响未来的生态系统健康和功能。此前有人建议将跨代表观遗传遗传纳入风险评估程序。然而,对现有文献的批判性回顾表明,许多声称具有跨代影响的研究证据不足。因此,污染物诱导的表观遗传遗传可能不如文献中报道的那么常见。我们发现需要进行多代表观遗传研究,这些研究不仅要扩展到对 F1 和 F2 配子的“直接暴露”,还要包括随后的多个非暴露代,以充分评估跨代恢复时间。此外,需要增加实验复制,以解释表观遗传反应的高度可变性和当前研究的明显不可重复性。此外,在确定是否需要进行风险管理之前,需要将表观遗传终点与可观察到的有害生物变化相关联。我们建议,基于表观遗传的污染物研究应包括低于当前“EC”或生物体最敏感表型终点的“最低可观察效应浓度”的浓度,因为较高的浓度可能已经受到监管。最后,我们提出了一个监管框架和最佳实验设计,使跨代表观遗传效应能够得到评估,并纳入传统的生态毒理学测试。