Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre for North Limburg, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):3017-3022. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4147-4. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
We evaluated the impact of a new Dutch guideline on systematic implementation of densitometric Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) in patients with a recent non-vertebral fracture. Systematic implementation resulted in a significant increase of VFA, diagnosis of vertebral fractures (VFs), and percentage of patients eligible for treatment.
VFs are underdiagnosed although they are important predictors of fracture risk, independent of age and bone mineral density (BMD). The Dutch guideline on osteoporosis and fracture prevention recommends VFA in all patients aged >50 years with a recent non-VF. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of systematic implementation of densitometric VFA in patients with a recent non-VF at the fracture liaison service (FLS).
VFA was performed on lateral images of the spine using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and graded according to Genant using Spine Analyzer software.
We evaluated 582 patients before and 484 after implementation (mean age 67 and 66 years; 71 and 74% women, respectively). Performing VFA increased from 4.6 to 97.1% (p < 0.001) and the diagnosis of VFs from 2.2 to 26.2% for grade ≥ 1 (p < 0.001) and from 0.9 to 14.7% for grade ≥ 2 (p < 0.001). Prevalence of VFs increased with age (5.2% in 50-59-year olds to 27.8% in 80+-year olds, p < 0.001), but was similar for both genders, non-VF locations, and BMD. Including patients with osteopenia and a VF increased the percentage of patients eligible for treatment by a quarter, from 31.0% in the pre-guideline to 38.4% in the post-guideline cohort.
Systematic guideline implementation resulted in a significant increase of VFA, diagnosis of VFs, and percentage of patients eligible for treatment. VFA contributes to documenting the high prevalence of VFs in patients visiting the FLS with a non-VF in both genders, at any age, non-VF location, and BMD.
评估新荷兰指南对最近发生非椎体骨折患者系统实施骨密度椎体骨折评估(VFA)的影响。系统实施导致 VFA、椎体骨折(VF)诊断和符合治疗条件的患者比例显著增加。
尽管 VF 是骨折风险的重要预测因素,且与年龄和骨密度(BMD)无关,但它们仍被漏诊。荷兰骨质疏松症和骨折预防指南建议在所有年龄>50 岁且最近发生非 VF 的患者中进行 VFA。我们的目的是评估在骨折联络服务(FLS)中对最近发生非 VF 的患者进行系统的 VFA 检测的效果。
使用双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)对脊柱的侧位图像进行 VFA,并使用 Spine Analyzer 软件根据 Genant 进行分级。
我们在实施前评估了 582 例患者,实施后评估了 484 例患者(平均年龄分别为 67 岁和 66 岁;分别为 71%和 74%的女性)。VFA 的实施率从 4.6%增加到 97.1%(p<0.001),VF 诊断率从 2.2%增加到 1 级≥26.2%(p<0.001),从 0.9%增加到 2 级≥14.7%(p<0.001)。VF 的患病率随年龄增加而增加(50-59 岁时为 5.2%,80+岁时为 27.8%,p<0.001),但在两性、非 VF 部位和 BMD 方面相似。包括骨质疏松症和 VF 的患者使符合治疗条件的患者比例增加了四分之一,从指南实施前的 31.0%增加到指南实施后的 38.4%。
系统指南的实施显著增加了 VFA、VF 诊断和符合治疗条件的患者比例。VFA 有助于记录在 FLS 就诊的有非 VF 的两性、任何年龄、非 VF 部位和 BMD 的患者中 VF 的高患病率。