Klein Eili Y, Levin Scott, Toerper Matthew F, Makowsky Michael D, Xu Tim, Cole Gai, Kelen Gabor D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, Washington, DC.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):607-614.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
A proposed benefit of expanding Medicaid eligibility under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a reduction in emergency department (ED) utilization for primary care needs. Pre-ACA studies found that new Medicaid enrollees increased their ED utilization rates, but the effect on system-level ED visits was less clear. Our objective was to estimate the effect of Medicaid expansion on aggregate and individual-based ED utilization patterns within Maryland.
We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of ED utilization patterns across Maryland, using data from Maryland's Health Services Cost Review Commission. We also analyzed utilization differences between pre-ACA (July 2012 to December 2013) uninsured patients who returned post-ACA (July 2014 to December 2015).
The total number of ED visits in Maryland decreased by 36,531 (-1.2%) between the 6 quarters pre-ACA and the 6 quarters post-ACA. Medicaid-covered ED visits increased from 23.3% to 28.9% (159,004 additional visits), whereas uninsured patient visits decreased from 16.3% to 10.4% (181,607 fewer visits). Coverage by other insurance types remained largely stable between periods. We found no significant relationship between Medicaid expansion and changes in ED volume by hospital. For patients uninsured pre-ACA who returned post-ACA, the adjusted visits per person during 6 quarters was 2.38 (95% confidence interval 2.35 to 2.40) for those newly enrolled in Medicaid post-ACA compared with 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.64 to 1.68) for those remaining uninsured.
There was a substantial increase in patients covered by Medicaid in the post-ACA period, but this did not significantly affect total ED volume. Returning patients newly enrolled in Medicaid visited the ED more than their uninsured counterparts; however, this cohort accounted for only a small percentage of total ED visits in Maryland.
根据《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)扩大医疗补助资格的一项预期益处是减少因初级保健需求而产生的急诊科(ED)就诊率。ACA实施前的研究发现,新加入医疗补助计划的人群提高了他们的急诊科就诊率,但对系统层面的急诊科就诊量的影响尚不清楚。我们的目标是评估医疗补助计划扩大对马里兰州总体和个体层面的急诊科就诊模式的影响。
我们利用马里兰州医疗服务成本审查委员会的数据,对马里兰州的急诊科就诊模式进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。我们还分析了ACA实施前(2012年7月至2013年12月)未参保患者在ACA实施后(2014年7月至2015年12月)复诊时的就诊差异。
在ACA实施前的6个季度到ACA实施后的6个季度期间,马里兰州的急诊科就诊总数减少了36,531次(-1.2%)。由医疗补助计划支付费用的急诊科就诊次数从23.3%增加到28.9%(增加了159,004次就诊),而未参保患者的就诊次数从16.3%下降到10.4%(减少了181,607次就诊)。其他保险类型的覆盖范围在不同时期基本保持稳定。我们发现医疗补助计划的扩大与各医院急诊科就诊量的变化之间没有显著关系。对于ACA实施前未参保而在ACA实施后复诊的患者,ACA实施后新加入医疗补助计划的患者在6个季度内的人均调整就诊次数为2.38次(95%置信区间为2.35至2.40),而仍未参保的患者为1.66次(95%置信区间为1.64至1.68)。
在ACA实施后的时期,由医疗补助计划覆盖的患者大幅增加,但这并未对急诊科就诊总量产生显著影响。新加入医疗补助计划的复诊患者比未参保的患者更多地前往急诊科就诊;然而,这一群体在马里兰州急诊科就诊总数中仅占一小部分。