Miller Eirwen M, Tymon-Rosario Joan, Xie Xianhong, Xue Xiaonan, Gressel Gregory M, Miller Devin T, Kuo Dennis Ys, Nevadunsky Nicole S
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, United States.
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Oct;147(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.129. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
The goal of our study was to define utilization and clinical results of intraperitoneal (IV/IP) compared to intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in a racially and ethnically diverse population with optimally debulked advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
After IRB approval, all patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer that underwent primary cytoreductive surgery at our institution from 2005 to 2016 were identified. Death was verified by the National Social Security Death Index. Patients who received at least one IV/IP cycle were analyzed in the IV/IP cohort. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were performed.
96 patients with advanced stage optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer (median follow up 33months) were identified. 51% and 49% of patients received IV/IP and IV chemotherapy, respectively. 27%, 22%, and 39% of patients were of white, black, and other race. Compared with IV chemotherapy only, IV/IP chemotherapy was associated with longer OS (log rank <0.002) and IV/IP chemotherapy versus IV chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower risk of death (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.62, P<0.001). The median overall survival for the IV/IP and IV groups was 76months (95% CI 62 - not estimated) and 38months (95% CI 30-55), respectively. There was a trend toward higher risk of death for patients who completed fewer than 6cycles of IV/IP chemotherapy compared to women who completed 6 IV/IP cycles (HR=3.2, 95% CI 0.98-9.27 (P=0.05). No differences in patient or tumor characteristics were identified between these two groups of patients.
In our racially diverse urban patients, 50% of patients received IV/IP chemotherapy and it was associated with improved overall survival compared to IV chemotherapy alone. Further investigation is needed to identify barriers to use of IV/IP chemotherapy.
我们研究的目的是确定在种族和民族多样化的、已接受最佳肿瘤细胞减灭术的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者中,与静脉化疗相比,腹腔内(IV/IP)化疗的应用情况及临床结果。
经机构审查委员会批准后,确定了2005年至2016年在我们机构接受原发性细胞减灭术的所有上皮性卵巢癌患者。通过国家社会保障死亡指数核实死亡情况。在IV/IP队列中分析接受至少一个IV/IP周期化疗的患者。进行了Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险模型分析。
确定了96例晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者(中位随访时间33个月),这些患者均接受了最佳肿瘤细胞减灭术。分别有51%和49%的患者接受了IV/IP化疗和静脉化疗。27%、22%和39%的患者分别为白人、黑人及其他种族。与单纯静脉化疗相比,IV/IP化疗与更长的总生存期相关(对数秩检验<0.002),且IV/IP化疗与单独静脉化疗相比,死亡风险更低(HR=0.31,95%置信区间0.16 - 0.62,P<0.001)。IV/IP组和静脉化疗组的中位总生存期分别为76个月(95%置信区间62 - 未估计)和38个月(95%置信区间30 - 55)。与完成6个IV/IP周期化疗的女性相比,完成少于6个IV/IP周期化疗的患者有更高的死亡风险趋势(HR=3.2,95%置信区间0.98 - 9.27,P = 0.05)。这两组患者在患者或肿瘤特征方面未发现差异。
在我们种族多样化的城市患者中,50%的患者接受了IV/IP化疗,与单纯静脉化疗相比,其总生存期得到改善。需要进一步研究以确定IV/IP化疗使用的障碍。