Zakeri Nekisa, Tsochatzis Emmanuel A
Sheila Sherlock Liver Unit and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital and UCL, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Sep;19(9):45. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0585-6.
Previous perceptions of cirrhosis as a hypocoagulable state have resulted in empirical blood product transfusions prior to invasive procedures. We evaluate procedure-related bleeding risks in patients with cirrhosis, assess the utility of conventional and newer global coagulation tests, and explore evidence surrounding prophylactic transfusion strategies.
Recent literature supports the concept of a rebalanced, albeit fragile, haemostasis equilibrium in cirrhosis, with a potential hypercoagulable tendency in stable patients. Standard coagulation tests provide a poor reflection of bleeding risks and yet are relied upon for transfusion thresholds. Consequently, a sizeable proportion of patients receive unnecessary blood products. The role of viscoelastic tests to guide transfusions requires further evaluation. In stable cirrhotic patients, procedure-related bleeding rates appear low. Prophylactic transfusion strategies based on arbitrary thresholds lack evidence of clinical benefit. There is a pressing need for point-of-care coagulation tests that represent the complex coagulopathy of cirrhosis and well-powered randomised controlled trials to develop evidence-based pre-procedure transfusion guidelines.
以往认为肝硬化处于低凝状态,导致在侵入性操作前经验性输注血液制品。我们评估肝硬化患者与操作相关的出血风险,评估传统和新型全血凝固试验的效用,并探讨预防性输血策略的相关证据。
近期文献支持肝硬化患者存在重新平衡但脆弱的止血平衡这一概念,稳定期患者可能存在高凝倾向。标准凝血试验不能很好地反映出血风险,但却被用于输血阈值的判断。因此,相当一部分患者接受了不必要的血液制品。黏弹性试验在指导输血方面的作用需要进一步评估。在稳定的肝硬化患者中,与操作相关的出血率似乎较低。基于任意阈值的预防性输血策略缺乏临床获益的证据。迫切需要能够反映肝硬化复杂凝血病的即时凝血试验以及有力的随机对照试验,以制定基于证据的操作前输血指南。