Xin Juan, Zhao Xiaohu, Tan Qiling, Sun Xuecheng, Hu Chengxiao
Hubei Provincial Engineering Laboratory for New Fertilizers/Research Center of Trace Elements/ Key laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (HZAU), MOE/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River), Ministry of Agriculture, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070 China.
Hubei Provincial Engineering Laboratory for New Fertilizers/Research Center of Trace Elements/ Key laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (HZAU), MOE/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River), Ministry of Agriculture, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070 China.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017 Nov;145:258-265. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.042. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
Cadmium (Cd) absorption and accumulation vary greatly not only among plant species but also among cultivars within the same species. In order to better understand the mechanisms of Cd absorption, transportation and distribution, we examined the differences of Cd absorption, translocation, subcellular distribution and chemical forms between L19, a Cd-tolerant genotype, and H4, a Cd-sensitive genotype, using kinetic analysis and soil culture experiment. Kinetic assays showed that the different Cd concentrations between the two cultivars might be ascribed to root absorption and translocation from root to shoot. The investigations of subcellular distribution and chemical forms verified that Cd concentrations of all subcellular fractions in H4 were all higher than in L19. Meanwhile, most of the Cd was associated with cell walls in the root of H4, but the Cd in the root of L19 and leaf of the two cultivars was mainly stored in soluble fraction, which could be one possible mechanism of tolerance to Cd toxicity. In addition, Cd fractions extracted by 1M NaCl and 2% HAC were predominant in root and leaf of both cultivars and the concentrations and proportions extracted by water and 80% ethanol in root and 1M NaCl in leaf were all higher in H4 than in L19. These results indicate that the Cd in H4 is more active than L19, which could be responsible for the sensitivity of H4 to Cd damage.
镉(Cd)的吸收和积累不仅在不同植物物种间差异很大,而且在同一物种的不同品种间也有很大差异。为了更好地理解镉的吸收、运输和分配机制,我们采用动力学分析和土壤培养实验,研究了耐镉基因型L19和镉敏感基因型H4在镉吸收、转运、亚细胞分布及化学形态上的差异。动力学分析表明,两个品种间镉浓度的差异可能归因于根系吸收以及从根到地上部的转运。亚细胞分布和化学形态研究证实,H4中所有亚细胞组分的镉浓度均高于L19。同时,H4根中大部分镉与细胞壁结合,而L19根及两个品种叶片中的镉主要储存于可溶性组分中,这可能是耐镉毒性的一种机制。此外,两个品种根和叶中以1M氯化钠和2%醋酸提取的镉组分占主导,且H4根中以水和80%乙醇提取以及叶中以1M氯化钠提取的镉浓度和比例均高于L19。这些结果表明,H4中的镉比L19更具活性,这可能是H4对镉损伤敏感的原因。