Suppr超能文献

在晚期前列腺癌中进行影像学现代化的理由。

Rationale for Modernising Imaging in Advanced Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK.

Department of Radiology, Centre du Cancer and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Apr;3(2-3):223-239. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

Abstract

CONTEXT

To effectively manage patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC), it is essential to have accurate, reproducible, and validated methods for detecting and quantifying the burden of bone and soft tissue metastases and for assessing their response to therapy. Current standard of care imaging with bone and computed tomography (CT) scans have significant limitations for the assessment of bone metastases in particular.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to undertake a critical comparative review of imaging methods used for diagnosis and disease monitoring of metastatic APC from the perspective of their availability and ability to assess disease presence, extent, and response of bone and soft tissue disease.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An expert panel of radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and medical physicists with the greatest experience of imaging in advanced prostate cancer prepared a review of the practicalities, performance, merits, and limitations of currently available imaging methods.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Meta-analyses showed that positron emission tomography (PET)/CT with different radiotracers and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) are more accurate for bone lesion detection than CT and bone scans (BSs). At a patient level, the pooled sensitivities for bone disease by using choline (CH)-PET/CT, WB-MRI, and BS were 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83-96%), 97% (95% CI, 91-99%), and 79% (95% CI, 73-83%), respectively. The pooled specificities for bone metastases detection using CH-PET/CT, WB-MRI, and BS were 99% (95% CI, 93-100%), 95% (95% CI, 90-97%), and 82% (95% CI, 78-85%), respectively. The ability of PET/CT and WB-MRI to assess therapeutic benefits is promising but has not been comprehensively evaluated. There is variability in the cost, availability, and quality of PET/CT and WB-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardisation of acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of WB-MRI and PET/CT scans is required to assess the performance of these techniques in clinical trials of treatment approaches in APC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

PET/CT and whole-body MRI scans have the potential to improve detection and to assess response to treatment of all states of advanced prostate cancer. Consensus recommendations on quality standards, interpretation, and reporting are needed but will require validation in clinical trials of established and new treatment approaches.

摘要

背景

为了有效管理晚期前列腺癌(APC)患者,必须要有准确、可重复和经过验证的方法来检测和量化骨和软组织转移的负担,并评估其对治疗的反应。目前,骨和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描的标准护理成像在评估骨转移方面存在显著的局限性。

目的

我们旨在从可及性和评估骨和软组织疾病的存在、程度和反应的能力的角度,对用于诊断和监测转移性 APC 的成像方法进行批判性的比较性综述。

证据获取

一组在晚期前列腺癌成像方面拥有最多经验的放射科医生、核医学医师和医学物理学家专家小组,对目前可用的成像方法的实用性、性能、优点和局限性进行了综述。

证据综合

荟萃分析显示,与 CT 和骨扫描(BS)相比,正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/CT 与不同放射性示踪剂和全身磁共振成像(WB-MRI)在骨病变检测方面更准确。在患者水平上,使用胆碱(CH)-PET/CT、WB-MRI 和 BS 检测骨疾病的汇总敏感性分别为 91%(95%置信区间[CI],83-96%)、97%(95%CI,91-99%)和 79%(95%CI,73-83%)。使用 CH-PET/CT、WB-MRI 和 BS 检测骨转移的汇总特异性分别为 99%(95%CI,93-100%)、95%(95%CI,90-97%)和 82%(95%CI,78-85%)。PET/CT 和 WB-MRI 评估治疗益处的能力很有前景,但尚未得到全面评估。PET/CT 和 WB-MRI 的成本、可用性和质量存在差异。

结论

需要对 WB-MRI 和 PET/CT 扫描的采集、解释和报告进行标准化,以评估这些技术在 APC 治疗方法临床试验中的性能。

患者总结

PET/CT 和全身 MRI 扫描有可能提高对晚期前列腺癌所有阶段的检测能力,并评估其对治疗的反应。需要关于质量标准、解释和报告的共识建议,但需要在新的和已确立的治疗方法的临床试验中进行验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验