Suppr超能文献

儿科呼吸支持技术与实践:一项全球调查。

Pediatric Respiratory Support Technology and Practices: A Global Survey.

作者信息

Arnim Amélie O von Saint André-von, Jamal Shelina M, John-Stewart Grace C, Musa Ndidiamaka L, Roberts Joan, Stanberry Larissa I, Howard Christopher R A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington and Seattle Children's, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S FA.2.112 P.O. Box 5371, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

Departments of Global Health, Medicine, Epidemiology, and Pediatrics, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359909, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Jul 21;5(3):34. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5030034.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This global survey aimed to assess the current respiratory support capabilities for children with hypoxemia and respiratory failure in different economic settings.

METHODS

An online, anonymous survey of medical providers with experience in managing pediatric acute respiratory illness was distributed electronically to members of the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Society, and other critical care websites for 3 months.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 295 participants from 64 countries, including 28 High-Income (HIC) and 36 Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Most respondents (≥84%) worked in urban tertiary care centers. For managing acute respiratory failure, endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation was the most commonly reported form of respiratory support (≥94% in LMIC and HIC). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) was the most commonly reported form of non-invasive positive pressure support (≥86% in LMIC and HIC). Bubble-CPAP was used by 36% HIC and 39% LMIC participants. ECMO for acute respiratory failure was reported by 45% of HIC participants, compared to 34% of LMIC. Oxygen, air, gas humidifiers, breathing circuits, patient interfaces, and oxygen saturation monitoring appear widely available. Reported ICU patient to health care provider ratios were higher in LMIC compared to HIC. The frequency of respiratory assessments was hourly in HIC, compared to every 2-4 h in LMIC.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey indicates many apparent similarities in the presence of respiratory support systems in urban care centers globally, but system quality, quantity, and functionality were not established by this survey. LMIC ICUs appear to have higher patient to medical staff ratios, with decreased patient monitoring frequencies, suggesting patient safety should be a focus during the introduction of new respiratory support devices and practices.

摘要

目的

这项全球调查旨在评估不同经济环境下对低氧血症和呼吸衰竭儿童的当前呼吸支持能力。

方法

对有小儿急性呼吸疾病管理经验的医疗服务提供者进行了一项在线匿名调查,以电子方式分发给世界儿科重症与危重症学会联合会成员以及其他重症监护网站,为期3个月。

结果

来自64个国家的295名参与者完成了调查,其中包括28个高收入国家(HIC)和36个低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)。大多数受访者(≥84%)在城市三级护理中心工作。对于急性呼吸衰竭的管理,气管插管机械通气是最常报告的呼吸支持形式(在低收入和中等收入国家以及高收入国家中均≥94%)。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是最常报告的无创正压支持形式(在低收入和中等收入国家以及高收入国家中均≥86%)。36%的高收入国家参与者和39%的低收入和中等收入国家参与者使用气泡式CPAP。45%的高收入国家参与者报告使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗急性呼吸衰竭,而低收入和中等收入国家为34%。氧气、空气、气体加湿器、呼吸回路、患者接口和血氧饱和度监测设备似乎广泛可用。与高收入国家相比,低收入和中等收入国家报告的ICU患者与医护人员比例更高。高收入国家呼吸评估频率为每小时一次,而低收入和中等收入国家为每2 - 4小时一次。

结论

这项调查表明全球城市护理中心的呼吸支持系统存在许多明显的相似之处,但本调查未确定系统的质量、数量和功能。低收入和中等收入国家的ICU患者与医护人员比例似乎更高,患者监测频率降低,这表明在引入新的呼吸支持设备和做法时应将患者安全作为重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f04/5618162/3e75a0e4095e/healthcare-05-00034-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验