Suppr超能文献

比较不同干细胞动员方案在 AL 淀粉样变性患者中的疗效。

Comparison of Different Stem Cell Mobilization Regimens in AL Amyloidosis Patients.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Germany.

Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, Heidelberg University, Germany; Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Nov;23(11):1870-1878. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Abstract

High-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) is an effective treatment for transplantation-eligible patients with systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Whereas most centers use granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), the application of mobilization chemotherapy might offer specific advantages. We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent PBSC collection. Major eligibility criteria included age <70 years and cardiac insufficiency New York Heart Association ≤III°. Before mobilization, 67 patients (61%) had been pretreated with induction therapy, including 17 (15%) patients who had received melphalan. Chemo-mobilization was performed with either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CAD)/G-CSF (n = 78, 71%); ifosfamide/G-CSF (n = 14, 13%); or other regimens (n = 8, 7%). AL amyloidosis patients with predominant heart involvement and/or status post heart transplantation were mobilized with G-CSF only (n = 10, 9%). PBSC collection was successful in 101 patients (92%) at first attempt. The median number of CD34 cells was 8.7 (range, 2.1 to 45.5) × 10 CD34/kg collected in a median of 1 leukapheresis (LP) session. Compared with G-CSF-only mobilization, a chemo-mobilization with CAD/G-CSF or ifosfamide/G-CSF had a positive impact on the number of collected CD34 cell number/kg per LP (P <.001, multivariate). Melphalan-containing previous therapy and higher age had a significant negative impact on quantity of collected CD34 cells. Median common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade of nonhematologic toxicity was II (range, 0 to IV). Life-threatening CTC grade IV adverse events were observed in 3 patients with no fatalities. Cardiovascular events were observed in 17 patients (22%) upon CAD/G-CSF mobilization (median CTC: grade 3; range, 1 to 4). Toxicity in patients undergoing ifosfamide/G-CSF mobilization was higher than in with those who received G-CSF-only mobilization. HDM and ABSCT were performed in 100 patients. Compared with >6.5 × 10 transplanted CD34 cells/kg, an ABSCT with <3 × 10 CD34 cells/kg was associated with a longer duration to leukocyte reconstitution >1 × 10/L and a reduced platelet count <150 × 10/L 1 year after ASCT. Our results show that CAD chemotherapy is very effective in PBSC mobilization and has a tolerable toxicity profile in AL amyloidosis patients. A further toxicity reduction by omission of doxorubicin might be considered. Because of advanced nonhematologic toxicity, ifosfamide administration cannot be recommended. However, G-CSF mobilization alone is also safe and effective. Considering the hematopoietic reconstitution and long-term stem cell function, our results provide a rationale to collect and transplant as many as >6.5 × 10 CD34 cells/kg, if feasible with reasonable effort.

摘要

高剂量美法仑 (HDM) 和自体血液干细胞移植 (ABSCT) 是适合移植的系统性轻链 (AL) 淀粉样变性患者的有效治疗方法。虽然大多数中心仅使用粒细胞集落刺激因子 (G-CSF) 进行外周血造血干细胞 (PBSC) 的动员,但动员化疗的应用可能具有特定的优势。我们回顾性分析了 110 例接受 PBSC 采集的 AL 淀粉样变性患者。主要入选标准包括年龄<70 岁和心脏功能不全纽约心脏协会 (NYHA)≤III°。在动员前,67 例 (61%) 患者接受了诱导治疗,其中 17 例 (15%) 患者接受了美法仑治疗。用环磷酰胺、多柔比星、地塞米松 (CAD)/G-CSF (n=78, 71%);异环磷酰胺/G-CSF (n=14, 13%);或其他方案 (n=8, 7%) 进行化疗动员。有主要心脏受累和/或心脏移植后患者仅用 G-CSF 动员 (n=10, 9%)。101 例 (92%) 患者首次尝试即成功采集 PBSC。中位 CD34 细胞数为 8.7(范围 2.1 至 45.5)×10 CD34/kg,中位数 1 次白细胞分离术 (LP) 采集。与 G-CSF 单独动员相比,CAD/G-CSF 或异环磷酰胺/G-CSF 的化疗动员对 LP 中每千克采集的 CD34 细胞数/kg 有积极影响 (P<.001,多变量)。含美法仑的既往治疗和较高的年龄对采集的 CD34 细胞数量有显著的负面影响。非血液学毒性的常见毒性标准 (CTC) 分级中位数为 II 级 (范围 0 至 IV 级)。3 例患者出现危及生命的 CTC 级 IV 级不良事件,但无死亡病例。在 CAD/G-CSF 动员期间观察到 17 例 (22%) 患者发生心血管事件 (中位 CTC:3 级;范围 1 至 4 级)。接受异环磷酰胺/G-CSF 动员的患者毒性高于仅接受 G-CSF 动员的患者。100 例患者接受了 HDM 和 ABSCT。与移植>6.5×10 CD34 细胞/kg 相比,ABSCT 时<3×10 CD34 细胞/kg 与白细胞重建>1×10/L 的时间延长和血小板计数<150×10/L 1 年有关。我们的结果表明,CAD 化疗在 PBSC 动员中非常有效,且在 AL 淀粉样变性患者中具有可耐受的毒性特征。通过省略多柔比星可能会进一步降低毒性。由于非血液学毒性的加重,不能推荐使用异环磷酰胺。然而,G-CSF 单独动员也是安全有效的。考虑到造血重建和长期干细胞功能,我们的结果提供了一个理由,即在可行的情况下,尽可能采集和移植>6.5×10 CD34 细胞/kg。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验