Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜异位症的诊断和管理:国际和国家指南的系统评价。

Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: a systematic review of international and national guidelines.

机构信息

Women's Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2018 Apr;125(5):556-564. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14838. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The development of clinical guidelines requires standardised methods informed by robust evidence synthesis.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the methodological quality of endometriosis guidelines, mapped their recommendations, and explored the relationships between recommendations and research evidence.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed from inception to February 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included guidelines related to the diagnosis and management of endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The search strategy identified 879 titles and abstracts. We include two international and five national guidelines. Four independent authors assessed the methodological quality of the included guidelines, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE-II) instrument, and systematically extracted the guideline recommendations and supporting research evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two different recommendations were made. Ten recommendations (7%) were comparable across guidelines. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology was objectively evaluated as the highest quality guideline (methodological quality score: 88/100). There was substantial variation between the supporting evidence presented by individual guidelines for comparable recommendations. Forty-two recommendations (28%) were not supported by research evidence. No guideline followed the standardised guideline development methods (AGREE-II).

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variation in the recommendations and methodological quality of endometriosis guidelines. Future guidelines should be developed with reference to high-quality methods in consultation with key stakeholders, including women with endometriosis, ensuring that their scope can truly inform clinical practice and eliminate unwarranted and unjustified variations in clinical practice. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: #Endometriosis guidelines vary in recommendations and quality. @EndometriosisUK.

摘要

背景

临床指南的制定需要基于稳健的证据综合的标准化方法。

目的

我们评估了子宫内膜异位症指南的方法学质量,绘制了它们的推荐内容,并探讨了推荐内容与研究证据之间的关系。

检索策略

我们从建库到 2016 年 2 月在 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 PubMed 上进行了检索。

选择标准

我们纳入了与子宫内膜异位症的诊断和管理相关的指南。

数据收集和分析

该检索策略共确定了 879 个标题和摘要。我们纳入了两项国际指南和五项国家指南。四名独立的作者使用评估指南研究与评价(AGREE-II)工具评估了纳入指南的方法学质量,并系统地提取了指南推荐内容和支持的研究证据。

主要结果

共提出了 152 项不同的推荐意见。有 10 项(7%)推荐意见在指南之间具有可比性。欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会被客观地评估为质量最高的指南(方法学质量得分为 88/100)。个别指南为可比推荐意见提供的支持证据存在很大差异。有 42 项(28%)推荐意见没有研究证据支持。没有一项指南遵循标准的指南制定方法(AGREE-II)。

结论

子宫内膜异位症指南的推荐内容和方法学质量存在很大差异。未来的指南应在与关键利益相关者(包括子宫内膜异位症患者)协商的基础上,参考高质量的方法进行制定,以确保其范围真正为临床实践提供信息,并消除临床实践中不必要和不合理的差异。

可推文摘要

#子宫内膜异位症指南的推荐内容和质量存在差异。@EndometriosisUK。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验