Byrn Stephen, Futran Maricio, Thomas Hayden, Jayjock Eric, Maron Nicola, Meyer Robert F, Myerson Allan S, Thien Michael P, Trout Bernhardt L
Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, 575 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Janssen Supply Group, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive Horsham, Pennsylvania.
J Pharm Sci. 2015 Mar;104(3):792-802. doi: 10.1002/jps.24247. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
We describe the key issues and possibilities for continuous final dosage formation, otherwise known as downstream processing or drug product manufacturing. A distinction is made between heterogeneous processing and homogeneous processing, the latter of which is expected to add more value to continuous manufacturing. We also give the key motivations for moving to continuous manufacturing, some of the exciting new technologies, and the barriers to implementation of continuous manufacturing. Continuous processing of heterogeneous blends is the natural first step in converting existing batch processes to continuous. In heterogeneous processing, there are discrete particles that can segregate, versus in homogeneous processing, components are blended and homogenized such that they do not segregate. Heterogeneous processing can incorporate technologies that are closer to existing technologies, where homogeneous processing necessitates the development and incorporation of new technologies. Homogeneous processing has the greatest potential for reaping the full rewards of continuous manufacturing, but it takes long-term vision and a more significant change in process development than heterogeneous processing. Heterogeneous processing has the detriment that, as the technologies are adopted rather than developed, there is a strong tendency to incorporate correction steps, what we call below "The Rube Goldberg Problem." Thus, although heterogeneous processing will likely play a major role in the near-term transformation of heterogeneous to continuous processing, it is expected that homogeneous processing is the next step that will follow. Specific action items for industry leaders are.
我们描述了连续最终剂型制备(也称为下游加工或药品制造)的关键问题和可能性。对非均相加工和均相加工进行了区分,预计后者将为连续制造带来更多价值。我们还给出了转向连续制造的关键动机、一些令人兴奋的新技术以及连续制造实施的障碍。对非均相混合物进行连续加工是将现有间歇工艺转变为连续工艺的自然第一步。在非均相加工中,存在可分离的离散颗粒,而在均相加工中,组分被混合并均质化,从而不会分离。非均相加工可以采用更接近现有技术的技术,而均相加工则需要开发和采用新技术。均相加工具有从连续制造中获得最大回报的最大潜力,但与非均相加工相比,它需要长期的眼光以及在工艺开发方面更重大的变革。非均相加工的弊端在于,由于采用而非开发这些技术,存在强烈的倾向去纳入校正步骤,我们在下文称之为“鲁布·戈德堡问题”。因此,尽管非均相加工可能在近期非均相到连续加工的转变中发挥主要作用,但预计均相加工将是接下来的下一步。行业领导者的具体行动项目如下。