Ong Jimmy, Lee Chia-Ling, Huang Shen-Jer, Shyr Ming-Hwang
Department of Anaesthesiology, Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia.
Department of Anesthesiology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Tzu Chi Med J. 2016 Jul-Sep;28(3):109-112. doi: 10.1016/j.tcmj.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
It remains to be determined whether the TVI-4000 Trachway video intubating (TVI) stylet (Markstein Sichtec Medical Corp, Taichung, Taiwan), an airway device for novices, improves airway management practice by experienced anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the TVI stylet in difficult tracheal intubation situations compared with that of using the Macintosh laryngoscope on an airway manikin.
Ten anesthesiologists (with 3-21 years' experience), including three senior residents, participated. We compared tracheal intubation in four airway scenarios: normal airway, tongue edema, cervical spine immobilization, and tongue edema combined with cervical spine immobilization. The time of tracheal intubation (TTI), success rate, and perceived difficulty of intubation for each scenario were compared and analyzed.
The TTI was significantly shorter in both the tongue edema and combined scenarios with the TVI stylet compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope (21.60 ± 1.45 seconds vs. 24.07 ± 1.58 seconds and 23.73 ± 2.05 seconds vs. 26.6 ± 2.77 seconds, respectively). Success rates for both devices were 100%. Concomitantly, participants rated using the TVI stylet in these two scenarios as being less difficult.
The learning time for tracheal intubation using the TVI stylet in difficult airway scenarios was short. Use of the TVI stylet was easier and required a shorter TTI for tracheal intubation in the tongue edema and combined scenarios.
尚待确定TVI - 4000气道视频插管(TVI)探条(台湾台中马克斯坦视科医疗公司),一种面向新手的气道装置,是否能改善经验丰富的麻醉医生的气道管理操作。本研究的目的是在气道模型上,将使用TVI探条与使用麦氏喉镜相比,评估其在困难气管插管情况下的可行性。
十名麻醉医生(经验为3至21年)参与,包括三名高年住院医师。我们比较了四种气道情况下的气管插管:正常气道、舌水肿、颈椎固定以及舌水肿合并颈椎固定。比较并分析了每种情况下的气管插管时间(TTI)、成功率以及插管的感知难度。
与麦氏喉镜相比,在舌水肿及合并情况下使用TVI探条时TTI显著更短(分别为21.60 ± 1.45秒对24.07 ± 1.58秒以及23.73 ± 2.05秒对26.6 ± 2.77秒)。两种器械的成功率均为100%。同时,参与者认为在这两种情况下使用TVI探条难度更低。
在困难气道情况下使用TVI探条进行气管插管的学习时间较短。在舌水肿及合并情况下,使用TVI探条更容易,气管插管所需的TTI更短。