Suppr超能文献

新手操作者使用 Trachway 插管管芯与 Airway Scope 进行气管插管的比较:一项模拟人体研究。

A comparison of Trachway intubating stylet and Airway Scope for tracheal intubation by novice operators: a manikin study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Aug;28(8):448-51. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.02.016. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

Abstract

The Trachway is a recently developed intubation device that resembles an illuminating stylet and incorporates a video-assisted system. This study evaluated the use of this system for tracheal intubation by novice operators. This randomized cross-over study compared the Trachway and the Airway Scope in simulated routine and difficult intubation scenarios. The difficult scenario was simulated by increasing the tongue volume of the manikin. The primary outcome measure in both airway scenarios was the time required for a successful tracheal intubation. For each scenario, the success rate, ease of intubation and operator preference were recorded for the two devices and compared. Average intubation time did not differ significantly between the Trachway and Airway Scope for the normal airway scenario (11.2 ± 6.5 vs. 9.8 ± 4.3 seconds, respectively; p = 0.07), but was significantly longer using the Trachway than with the Airway Scope on the difficult airway scenario (17.1 ± 11.1 vs. 9.5 ± 4.1 seconds, respectively; p < 0.001). The overall success rates of the Trachway and Airway Scope (96.3% and 98.6%, respectively) did not differ significantly (p = 0.13). Preference for the Airway Scope was greater in both scenarios, and particularly in the difficult airway scenario (p < 0.001). Although the devices are comparable in terms of ease of use and intubation time in normal scenarios, the ease of using the Airway Scope makes it more suitable for inexperienced operators in difficult intubation scenarios.

摘要

经口气管插管导丝(Trachway)是一种新研发的气管插管设备,类似带有照明的气管内插管引导丝,并整合了视频辅助系统。本研究评估了该系统在非专业操作人员行气管插管中的应用。这是一项随机交叉研究,比较了 Trachway 和 Airway Scope 在模拟常规和困难气管插管场景中的应用。通过增加模拟人舌体体积来模拟困难场景。主要的气道场景结局指标是成功气管插管所需的时间。对于每个场景,记录了两种设备在气管插管中的成功率、插管难易程度和操作者偏好,并进行了比较。在正常气道场景中,Trachway 和 Airway Scope 的平均插管时间无显著差异(分别为 11.2 ± 6.5 秒和 9.8 ± 4.3 秒;p = 0.07),但在困难气道场景中,Trachway 的平均插管时间明显长于 Airway Scope(分别为 17.1 ± 11.1 秒和 9.5 ± 4.1 秒;p < 0.001)。Trachway 和 Airway Scope 的总体成功率(分别为 96.3%和 98.6%)无显著差异(p = 0.13)。两种设备在两种场景中的操作者偏好均倾向于 Airway Scope,尤其是在困难气道场景中(p < 0.001)。尽管在正常场景中,两种设备在使用方便性和插管时间方面具有可比性,但在困难插管场景中,Airway Scope 更容易使用,因此更适合经验不足的操作者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验