Suppr超能文献

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值可预测心脏移植后的生存率。

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of survival after heart transplantation.

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;5(1):149-156. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12199. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict outcome in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTX).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 111 HF patients undergoing HTX 2010-2015 were retrospectively reviewed. NLR and PLR were calculated before HTX, immediately after HTX, and at 6 and 24 hours. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, and secondary endpoints were 1 year mortality and renal replacement therapy (RRT). Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis, and the predictive values of NLR and PLR for mortality were compared. The discriminatory performance for predicting in-hospital mortality was better for NLR [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.644, 95% confidence interval 0.492-0.797] than for PLR (AUC = 0.599, 95% confidence interval 0.423-0.776). Best cut-off value was 2.41 for NLR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 67%) and 92.5 for PLR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 68%). When divided according to best cut-off value, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the high NLR group (17.5% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.05), but not in the high PLR group (16.5% vs. 6.3%, P = ns). One year mortality was not significantly higher for either group (37.5% vs. 6.5% for NLR; 36.7% vs. 9.4% for PLR, P = ns for both), while RRT was significantly higher in both the NLR and PLR high groups (33.8% vs. 0%; 32.9% vs. 3.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that only high NLR (hazard ratio = 3.403, P < 0.05) and pre-transplant diabetes (hazard ratio = 3.364, P < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for 1 year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

High NLR was a predictor for in-hospital mortality, and an independent prognostic factor for 1 year mortality. Both high NLR and high PLR were predictors for RRT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)是否可预测行心脏移植(HTX)的心力衰竭(HF)患者的结局。

方法和结果

回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2015 年期间行 HTX 的 111 例 HF 患者的数据。在 HTX 前、HTX 后即刻以及 6 和 24 小时计算 NLR 和 PLR。主要终点为住院期间死亡率,次要终点为 1 年死亡率和肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。通过多变量分析评估预后因素,并比较 NLR 和 PLR 对死亡率的预测价值。预测住院期间死亡率的区分性能 NLR 优于 PLR [受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)=0.644,95%置信区间 0.492-0.797]。NLR 的最佳截断值为 2.41(敏感性 86%,特异性 67%),PLR 的最佳截断值为 92.5(敏感性 86%,特异性 68%)。根据最佳截断值进行分组时,NLR 高组的住院期间死亡率明显更高(17.5%比 3.2%,P<0.05),但 PLR 高组无显著差异(16.5%比 6.3%,P=ns)。两组的 1 年死亡率均无显著差异(NLR 组为 37.5%比 6.5%;PLR 组为 36.7%比 9.4%,P=ns),但 NLR 和 PLR 高组的 RRT 均显著升高(NLR 组为 33.8%比 0%;PLR 组为 32.9%比 3.1%,P<0.001)。多变量分析表明,只有高 NLR(危险比=3.403,P<0.05)和移植前糖尿病(危险比=3.364,P<0.05)是 1 年死亡率的独立预后因素。

结论

高 NLR 是住院期间死亡率的预测指标,也是 1 年死亡率的独立预后因素。高 NLR 和高 PLR 均是 RRT 的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd60/5793982/ff1206d2f225/EHF2-5-149-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验