• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛资源护士计划在改善医院环境中的疼痛管理中的效果:一项群组随机对照试验。

The effectiveness of the Pain Resource Nurse Program to improve pain management in the hospital setting: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland, Iceland; University of Iceland, Iceland.

University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Oct;75:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.009
PMID:28759823
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Pain Resource Nurse program is a widely disseminated, evidence-based, nursing staff development program, designed to improve pain management in hospitals. The program has shown promising results, but has never been tested with a rigorous research design.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to test the effectiveness of the Pain Resource Nurse program. Hypothesized outcomes included improvements in nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and assessment practices, and in patients' participation in decision-making, adequacy of pain management, pain severity, time spent in severe pain, pain interference, and satisfaction.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

A 650-bed university hospital in Iceland Participants: The sample consisted of a) patients ≥18 years of age, native speaking, hospitalized for at least 24h, alert and able to participate; and b) registered nurses who worked on the participating units.

METHODS

Twenty three surgical and medical inpatient units were randomly assigned to the Pain Resource Nurse program (n=12) or to wait list control (n=11). The American Pain Society Outcome Questionnaire and the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey were used to collect data from patients and nurses respectively. Baseline data (T1) for patients were collected simultaneously on all units, followed by data collection from nurses. Then randomization took place, and the Pain Resource Nurse program was instituted. Ten months later, follow up (T2) data were collected, after which the nurses on the control group units received the Pain Resource Nurse program.

RESULTS

At baseline, data were collected from 305 of the 396 eligible patients and at follow up from 326 of the 392 eligible patients, a 77% and 83% response rate respectively. At baseline, 232 of 479 eligible nurses responded and at follow-up 176 of the eligible 451 nurses responded, a 49% and 39% response rate, respectively. A nested mixed model analysis of covariance revealed that the intervention was successful in changing pain assessment practices, with pain assessment using standardized measures increasing from 13% to 25% in the intervention group while decreasing from 21% to 16% in the control group. None of the other hypothesized improvements were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pain Resource Nurse program was successful in improving nurses' use of standardized measures for pain assessment. No effects were found on patient outcomes; pain was both prevalent and severe at both time points. Only minimal improvements were noted in response to this evidence-based staff development program. Changes in pain management practices remain a challenge in clinical settings.

摘要

背景

疼痛资源护士计划是一个广泛传播的、基于证据的护理人员发展计划,旨在改善医院的疼痛管理。该计划已显示出有希望的结果,但从未经过严格的研究设计测试。

目的

我们的目的是测试疼痛资源护士计划的有效性。假设的结果包括改善护士的知识、态度和评估实践,以及患者参与决策、疼痛管理的充分性、疼痛严重程度、处于严重疼痛中的时间、疼痛干扰和满意度。

设计

整群随机对照试验。

设置

冰岛的一家 650 床位的大学医院。

参与者

样本包括 a)年龄≥18 岁、母语为英语、住院至少 24 小时、意识清醒且能够参与的患者;和 b)在参与单位工作的注册护士。

方法

23 个外科和内科住院单位被随机分配到疼痛资源护士计划(n=12)或候补名单对照(n=11)。美国疼痛协会结局问卷和知识与态度调查分别用于收集患者和护士的数据。对患者进行基线数据(T1)收集,同时在所有单位进行,然后收集护士的数据。然后进行随机分组,并实施疼痛资源护士计划。10 个月后,进行随访(T2)数据收集,之后对照组单位的护士接受疼痛资源护士计划。

结果

在基线时,从 396 名符合条件的患者中收集了 305 名患者的数据,在随访时从 392 名符合条件的患者中收集了 326 名患者的数据,应答率分别为 77%和 83%。在基线时,从 479 名符合条件的护士中收集了 232 名护士的数据,在随访时从 451 名符合条件的护士中收集了 176 名护士的数据,应答率分别为 49%和 39%。嵌套混合模型协方差分析显示,干预成功地改变了疼痛评估实践,干预组使用标准化措施进行疼痛评估的比例从 13%增加到 25%,而对照组从 21%下降到 16%。没有发现其他假设的改善。

结论

疼痛资源护士计划成功地改善了护士对疼痛评估的标准化措施的使用。对患者结局没有影响;在两个时间点,疼痛都既普遍又严重。对这一基于证据的员工发展计划仅注意到了最小的改进。在临床环境中,疼痛管理实践的改变仍然是一个挑战。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of the Pain Resource Nurse Program to improve pain management in the hospital setting: A cluster randomized controlled trial.疼痛资源护士计划在改善医院环境中的疼痛管理中的效果:一项群组随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Oct;75:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
2
Effects of a pain education program on nurses' pain knowledge, attitudes and pain assessment practices in China.疼痛教育项目对中国护士疼痛知识、态度及疼痛评估实践的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Dec;36(6):616-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.020. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
3
Improving knowledge, assessment, and attitudes related to pain management: evaluation of an intervention.改善与疼痛管理相关的知识、评估和态度:一项干预措施的评估
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Jun;15(2):474-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
4
Quality pain management in the hospital setting from the patient's perspective.从患者角度看医院环境中的优质疼痛管理。
Pain Pract. 2015 Mar;15(3):236-46. doi: 10.1111/papr.12166. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
5
Implementing a pain management nursing protocol for orthopaedic surgical patients: Results from a PAIN OUT project.实施骨科手术患者疼痛管理护理方案:PAIN OUT 项目的结果。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):1684-1691. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14224. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Oncology Nursing Certification: Relation to Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes About Pain, Patient-Reported Pain Care Quality, and Pain Outcomes.肿瘤护理认证:与护士对疼痛的知识和态度、患者报告的疼痛护理质量及疼痛结局的关系
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 Jan;43(1):67-76. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.67-76.
7
Influencing Nursing Knowledge and Attitudes to Positively Affect Care of Patients with Persistent Pain in the Hospital Setting.影响护理知识和态度以积极影响医院环境中持续性疼痛患者的护理
Pain Manag Nurs. 2017 Jun;18(3):137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2017.04.002.
8
Enhancing Nurses' Pain Assessment to Improve Patient Satisfaction.加强护士的疼痛评估以提高患者满意度。
Orthop Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;35(2):108-17; quiz 118-9. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000226.
9
Front-line management, staffing and nurse-doctor relationships as predictors of nurse and patient outcomes. a survey of Icelandic hospital nurses.一线管理、人员配备及护士与医生的关系对护士和患者结局的预测作用:冰岛医院护士调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jul;46(7):920-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.11.007. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
10
Patient perceptions of pain management therapy: a comparison of real-time assessment of patient education and satisfaction and registered nurse perceptions.患者对疼痛管理治疗的认知:患者教育与满意度实时评估与注册护士认知的比较
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Dec;13(4):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and Dissemination of the Interprofessional Pediatric Pain PRN Curriculum.跨专业儿科疼痛按需治疗课程的效果和传播。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022 Apr 1;42(2):135-143. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000410. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
Implementation of a nurse-led self-management support intervention for patients with cancer-related pain: a cluster randomized phase-IV study with a stepped wedge design (EvANtiPain).实施护士主导的癌症相关疼痛患者自我管理支持干预:一项采用阶段 IV 设计的群组随机对照研究(EvANtiPain)。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06729-0.
3
Nursing Education Intervention Effects on Pain Intensity of Nursing Home Residents with Different Levels of Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
护理教育干预对不同认知障碍水平养老院居民疼痛强度的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2020 Mar 26;13:633-648. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S237056. eCollection 2020.
4
Feasibility of a Hybrid Web-Based and In-Person Self-management Intervention Aimed at Preventing Acute to Chronic Pain Transition After Major Lower Extremity Trauma (iPACT-E-Trauma): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络和线下混合模式的自我管理干预预防下肢大创伤后急慢性疼痛转变的可行性研究(iPACT-E-Trauma):一项先导随机对照试验
Pain Med. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):2018-2032. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz008.