Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(1):57-67. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170292.
Apathy is a complex multidimensional syndrome frequently reported in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is associated with impaired awareness. Here we present a psychometrically robust method to profile apathy in AD.
To determine the validity and reliability of a multidimensional apathy measure, the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS), and explore the apathy subtype profile and its associations in AD.
102 people with AD and 55 healthy controls were recruited. Participants completed the DAS, the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), Geriatric Depression Short form (GDS-15), and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (LIADL). Psychometric properties of the DAS were determined. AD-Control comparison was performed to explore group differences on the DAS. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to explore the profile of apathy in AD.
The DAS had a good to excellent Cronbach's standardized alpha (self-rated = 0.85, informant/carer-rated = 0.93) and good convergent and divergent validity against standard apathy (AES) and depression (GDS-15) measures. Group comparison showed people with AD were significantly higher for all apathy subtypes than controls (p < 0.001), and lacking in awareness over all apathy subtype deficits. LCA showed three distinct AD subgroups, with 42.2% in the Executive-Initiation apathy, 28.4% in the Global apathy, and 29.4% in the Minimal apathy group.
The DAS is a psychometrically robust method of assessing multidimensional apathy in AD. The apathy profiles in AD are heterogeneous, with additional specific impairments relating to awareness dependent on apathy subtype.
淡漠是阿尔茨海默病(AD)中经常报告的一种复杂的多维综合征,与意识受损有关。在这里,我们提出了一种心理测量上稳健的方法来描述 AD 中的淡漠。
确定多维淡漠量表(DAS)的有效性和可靠性,并探讨 AD 中淡漠亚型的特征及其相关性。
招募了 102 名 AD 患者和 55 名健康对照者。参与者完成了 DAS、淡漠评估量表(AES)、老年抑郁简短量表(GDS-15)和 Lawton 工具性日常生活活动量表(LIADL)。确定了 DAS 的心理测量特性。进行 AD-对照比较,以探讨 DAS 上的组间差异。采用潜在类别分析(LCA)探索 AD 中淡漠的特征。
DAS 的 Cronbach's 标准化 alpha 良好到优秀(自评=0.85,知情者/照顾者评定=0.93),与标准淡漠(AES)和抑郁(GDS-15)测量具有良好的收敛和发散效度。组间比较显示,AD 患者的所有淡漠亚型得分均明显高于对照组(p<0.001),且所有淡漠亚型缺陷均缺乏意识。LCA 显示 AD 有三个不同的亚组,42.2%为执行启动淡漠,28.4%为全面淡漠,29.4%为轻度淡漠组。
DAS 是评估 AD 中多维淡漠的一种心理测量上稳健的方法。AD 中的淡漠特征是异质的,与淡漠亚型相关的特定意识缺陷有所增加。