Kim Min-Jung, Kim Ryan Jin-Young, Ferracane Jack, Lee In-Bog
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Dent Mater. 2017 Oct;33(10):e373-e383. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
The purpose of this study was to investigate temperature rise in the composite and dentin of a class I cavity in extracted human molars under different restoration conditions, including the use of different composite types, layering methods, and curing lights.
Open occlusal cavities were prepared on 28 extracted human molars. A conventional (Filtek Z250) and a bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior; BFP) composite were used to restore the preparations. BFP was incrementally layered or bulk-filled. Bulk-filled BFP was cured with two different lights, the Elipar S10 and the BeLite. Each layer was illuminated for 20s, while thermograms of the specimens were recorded for 100s using an infrared thermal camera. Temperature changes on the composite and dentin surfaces were obtained at points of interest (POI) pertaining to successive incremental distances of 0.75mm from the top of the cavity to the pulp. The polymerization kinetics of each composite was determined using photo-differential scanning calorimetry.
The greatest temperature rise was observed 0.75mm apical from the top of the cavity. All groups showed over 6°C maximum temperature rise (ΔT) at the pulpal side of the dentin. Upon curing, Z250 reached ΔT=5°C faster than BFP; however, ΔT of the two composites were comparable at any POI. Bulk filling showed greater ΔT than incremental filling at 0.75mm apical from the top and in the middle of the cavity. The Elipar S10 light generated faster temperature changes in the curing composite at all recorded positions throughout the depth of the cavity and greater ΔT in all POIs compared to BeLite.
Real-time thermographic analysis demonstrated that the composite type and layering method did not influence the temperature rise at the pulpal side of dentin during composite restoration of an occlusal preparation in a tooth. The amount and initial rate of temperature increase was most affected by the radiant exposure of the light curing unit. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, when irradiation time is constant, a curing light with higher radiant power can induce relatively high thermal transfer, thereby increasing the risk of pulpal damage.
本研究旨在调查在不同修复条件下,包括使用不同类型的复合树脂、分层方法和固化灯,拔除的人类磨牙I类洞复合树脂和牙本质中的温度升高情况。
在28颗拔除的人类磨牙上制备开放的咬合面洞。使用传统复合树脂(Filtek Z250)和大块充填复合树脂(Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior;BFP)修复制备的洞。BFP采用分层增量或大块充填方式。大块充填的BFP用两种不同的光固化,即Elipar S10和BeLite。每层照射20秒,同时使用红外热像仪记录标本的热成像图100秒。在从洞顶到牙髓的连续增量距离为0.75mm的感兴趣点(POI)处,获得复合树脂和牙本质表面的温度变化。使用光差示扫描量热法测定每种复合树脂的聚合动力学。
在距洞顶根尖0.75mm处观察到最大温度升高。所有组在牙本质牙髓侧的最高温度升高(ΔT)均超过6°C。固化时,Z250比BFP更快达到ΔT = 5°C;然而,在任何POI处,两种复合树脂的ΔT相当。在距洞顶根尖0.75mm处和洞中部,大块充填显示出比分层增量充填更大的ΔT。与BeLite相比,Elipar S10光在整个洞深度的所有记录位置的固化复合树脂中产生更快的温度变化,并且在所有POI处的ΔT更大。
实时热成像分析表明,在牙齿咬合面制备的复合树脂修复过程中,复合树脂类型和分层方法不影响牙本质牙髓侧的温度升高。温度升高的量和初始速率受光固化装置的辐射暴露影响最大。在本体外研究的局限性内,当照射时间恒定时,具有较高辐射功率的固化灯可诱导相对较高的热传递,从而增加牙髓损伤的风险。