Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dent Mater. 2021 Aug;37(8):1237-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of (i) a high-irradiance (3s) light-curing protocol versus (ii) two standard-irradiance (10s) protocols on 2D temperature maps during intra-dental photo-irradiation within a molar cavity restored with either Ultra-Rapid Photo-Polymerized Bulk Fill (URPBF) composites or a pre-heated thermo-viscous bulk-fill composite, compared to a standard bulk-fill resin-based-composite (RBC). The specific objectives included visual assessment of the temperature maps and quantitative assessment of several temperature/time plots at four different locations.
A caries-free lower first molar cavity served as a natural tooth mold. Resin composites were placed without intermediary adhesive. Two URPBF composites (PFill; PFlow) and one pre-heated thermo-viscous bulk-fill composite (Viscalor: VC) were compared to a contemporary bulk-fill composite (One Bulk Fill: OBF). Two LED-LCU devices were used: Bluephase PowerCure (PC) and Elipar S10 (S10), with three light-irradiation protocols (PC-3s, PC-10s and S10-10s). 2D temperature maps over the entire coronal area were recorded for 120 s during and after irradiation using a thermal imaging camera. Changes at four different levels were selected from the data sets: (0, 2 and 4 mm from the cavity top and at 1 mm below the dentin cavity floor). The maximum temperature attained (T), the mean temperature rise (ΔT), the time (s) to reach maximum temperature and the integrated areas (°C s) under the temperature/time (T/t) plots were identified. Data were analysed via three-way ANOVA, One-way ANOVA, independent t-tests and Tukey post-hoc tests (p < 0.05).
All RBCs showed qualitatively similar temperature-time profiles. PFlow reached T in the shortest time. PC-3s (3000 mW/cm) generated comparable ΔT to S10-10s, except with PFill, where ΔT was greater. Despite the same irradiance (1200 mW/cm), Elipar S10 led to higher T and ΔT compared to PC-10s. The highest T and ΔT were observed at the 2 mm level, and the lowest were at 1 mm depth into the underlying dentin.
Coronal 2D temperature maps showed rises largely confined within the bulk-fill RBC materials, with maxima at 2 mm rather than 4 mm depth indicating some extent of thermal insulation for the underlying dentin and pulp. RBCs polymerized via different irradiation protocols showed similar temperature changes. With the PC-3s protocol - also with pre-heated VC - minimal temperature rises at 1 mm within dentin suggest their clinical safety when sufficient remaining dentin thickness is present.
本研究旨在探讨在磨牙腔中用光固化(i)高辐射(3 秒)协议和(ii)两种标准辐射(10 秒)协议对 2D 温度图的影响,在磨牙腔中用光固化,腔内填充的是超快速光聚合块状填充复合材料(URPBF)还是预加热的热粘性块状填充复合材料,与标准块状填充树脂基复合材料(RBC)相比。具体目标包括对温度图进行视觉评估,并在四个不同位置对几个温度/时间图进行定量评估。
无龋下第一磨牙腔作为天然牙模具。不使用中间粘结剂放置树脂复合材料。将两种 URPBF 复合材料(PFill;PFlow)和一种预加热的热粘性块状填充复合材料(Viscalor:VC)与一种现代块状填充复合材料(One Bulk Fill:OBF)进行比较。使用了两种 LED-LCU 设备:Bluephase PowerCure(PC)和 Elipar S10(S10),并采用了三种光辐射方案(PC-3s、PC-10s 和 S10-10s)。在照射期间和照射后使用热成像相机记录整个牙冠区域的 120 秒 2D 温度图。从数据集选择四个不同水平的变化:(距腔顶 0、2 和 4 毫米处,以及在牙本质腔底下方 1 毫米处)。确定达到的最高温度(T)、平均温升(ΔT)、达到最高温度的时间(s)和温度/时间(T/t)图下的积分面积(°C s)。数据通过三因素方差分析、单因素方差分析、独立 t 检验和 Tukey 事后检验(p < 0.05)进行分析。
所有 RBC 均显示出定性相似的温度-时间曲线。PFlow 在最短时间内达到 T。PC-3s(3000 mW/cm)产生的ΔT 与 S10-10s 相当,除了 PFill,其中ΔT 更高。尽管辐照度相同(1200 mW/cm),但与 PC-10s 相比,Elipar S10 导致更高的 T 和ΔT。在 2mm 水平观察到最高 T 和ΔT,在牙本质下 1mm 深度处观察到最低 T 和ΔT。
冠状 2D 温度图显示,升温主要局限于块状填充 RBC 材料内,最大值在 2mm 处,而不是在 4mm 深处,表明对下方牙本质和牙髓有一定程度的热隔离。通过不同的辐照方案聚合的 RBC 显示出相似的温度变化。使用 PC-3s 方案-也使用预加热的 VC-在牙本质内 1mm 处的最小温升表明,当有足够的剩余牙本质厚度时,它们在临床上是安全的。