Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;36(2):193-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.066. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Adverse events, including aspiration, occur during Emergency Department (ED) intubation, but their contemporary incidence is not well described. We sought to estimate the rate of aspiration pneumonia potentially related to emergency intubation.
We conducted a prospective observational study of adult patients who were endotracheally intubated in the ED. Using a standard definition, we determined the proportion of patients who developed aspiration pneumonia after intubation. Aspiration pneumonia was defined as any of the following in patients without a diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia, healthcare-associated pneumonia, or aspiration prior to intubation: pathogenic growth in sputum culture, unexplained hypoxemia, or radiographic evidence of pneumonia in the first 48h after intubation. Baseline characteristics and intubation details were compared for those with and without aspiration pneumonia.
879 patients were enrolled over a 30-month period. Intubation was facilitated by video laryngoscopy (49%), direct laryngoscopy (45%), nasal intubation (4%), a intubating laryngeal mask airway (1%), and a surgical airway (0.1%). 85% were intubated on the first attempt, 12% on the second, 3% on the third or more attempts. 25% of patients experienced an oxygen saturation <90% during the intubation. After excluding patients not eligible for the outcome assessment (those who died within 48h without findings of pneumonia), 66/823 (8%) developed aspiration pneumonia potentially related to ED intubation. In comparing those with and without aspiration pneumonia, there were no differences between first intubation attempt parameters and the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia.
Aspiration pneumonia occurred commonly in this cohort. Although we did not identify any intubation factors that differed between those with and without with aspiration pneumonia, these findings should remind emergency physicians that emergency endotracheal intubation remains a high-risk procedure, and all care should be taken to minimize the risk of peri-intubation complications.
急诊科(ED)插管过程中会发生不良事件,包括误吸,但目前对其发生率尚不清楚。我们旨在评估可能与急诊插管相关的吸入性肺炎的发生率。
我们对在 ED 进行气管插管的成年患者进行了前瞻性观察性研究。使用标准定义,我们确定了插管后发生吸入性肺炎的患者比例。将吸入性肺炎定义为无社区获得性肺炎、医疗保健相关性肺炎或插管前误吸诊断的患者出现以下任何一种情况:痰培养中病原体生长、不明原因的低氧血症或插管后 48 小时内出现肺炎的放射影像学证据。比较吸入性肺炎患者和无吸入性肺炎患者的基线特征和插管细节。
在 30 个月的时间内,共纳入 879 例患者。通过视频喉镜(49%)、直接喉镜(45%)、鼻插管(4%)、插管型喉罩气道(1%)和外科气道(0.1%)进行插管。85%的患者在第一次尝试时插管成功,12%的患者在第二次尝试时插管成功,3%的患者在第三次或更多次尝试时插管成功。25%的患者在插管过程中出现血氧饱和度<90%。在排除了不符合结局评估条件的患者(在 48 小时内死亡且无肺炎发现的患者)后,823 例患者中有 66 例(8%)发生了可能与 ED 插管相关的吸入性肺炎。比较有和无吸入性肺炎的患者,首次插管尝试参数与吸入性肺炎的发生之间无差异。
在本队列中,吸入性肺炎的发生率较高。尽管我们未发现任何与有无吸入性肺炎相关的插管因素存在差异,但这些发现应提醒急诊医生,急诊气管插管仍然是一项高风险操作,应采取一切措施尽量减少围插管期并发症的风险。