Suppr超能文献

快速顺序诱导期间的误吸:发生率及危险因素

Aspiration during Rapid Sequence Induction: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

作者信息

Roshan Ramgopal, Dhanapal Sudhakar G, Joshua Vijay, Madhiyazhagan Mamta, Amirtharaj Jayakumar, Priya Ganesan, Abhilash Kundavaram Pp

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;25(2):140-145. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23714.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Securing definitive airway with minimal complications is a challenging task for high-volume emergency departments (ED) that deal with patients with compromised airway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study between September 2019 and March 2020. Cohort of adults presenting to the ED requiring rapid sequence induction (RSI) were recruited to determine the prevalence and risk factors for the development of aspiration pneumonia(AP) in patients intubated in the ED.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 154 patients with a mean age of 44.5 years required RSI in the ED. Male (61%) predominance was noted among the study cohorts. We did not find any association between RSI performed in the ED and the risk of developing AP. The first attempt success rate of RSI was 76.7%, and 33(21.4%) patients had immediate adverse events following RSI. Rescue intubation was required for 11(7.1%) patients. The prevalence of AP following RSI in the ED was 13.4%. Endotracheal tube (ET) aspirate pepsin was positive in 45(29.2%) samples collected. The ET aspirate pepsin assay had low sensitivity (44.44%), specificity (73.53%), positive predictive value (18%), and negative predictive value (91%) in predicting the occurrence of AP. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, male gender (AOR: 7.29, 95%CI: 1.51-35.03, = 0.013) and diabetes mellitus (AOR: 3.75, 95%CI: 1.23-11.51, = 0.02) were found to be independent risk factors for developing AP.

CONCLUSION

We identified male gender and diabetes mellitus to be independent predictors of risk of developing AP after RSI in the ED. ET aspirate pepsin levels proved to be neither sensitive nor specific in the diagnosis of AP.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Roshan R, Sudhakar GD, Vijay J, Mamta M, Amirtharaj J, Priya G, Aspiration during Rapid Sequence Induction: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):140-145.

摘要

背景

对于处理气道受损患者的大容量急诊科而言,以最小并发症确保确定性气道是一项具有挑战性的任务。

材料与方法

我们在2019年9月至2020年3月期间进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。招募到急诊科就诊且需要快速顺序诱导(RSI)的成年队列,以确定在急诊科插管患者中发生吸入性肺炎(AP)的患病率和危险因素。

结果

在研究期间,急诊科共有154例平均年龄为44.5岁的患者需要进行RSI。研究队列中男性占主导(61%)。我们未发现急诊科进行的RSI与发生AP的风险之间存在任何关联。RSI的首次尝试成功率为76.7%,33例(21.4%)患者在RSI后立即出现不良事件。11例(7.1%)患者需要进行挽救性插管。急诊科RSI后AP的患病率为13.4%。在收集的45份(29.2%)样本中,气管内导管(ET)吸出物胃蛋白酶呈阳性。ET吸出物胃蛋白酶检测在预测AP发生方面的敏感性低(44.44%)、特异性低(73.53%)、阳性预测值低(18%)和阴性预测值高(91%)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,男性(比值比:7.29,95%置信区间:1.51 - 35.03,P = 0.013)和糖尿病(比值比:3.75,95%置信区间:1.23 - 11.51,P = 0.02)被发现是发生AP的独立危险因素。

结论

我们确定男性和糖尿病是急诊科RSI后发生AP风险的独立预测因素。事实证明,ET吸出物胃蛋白酶水平在AP诊断中既不敏感也不特异。

如何引用本文

Roshan R, Sudhakar GD, Vijay J, Mamta M, Amirtharaj J, Priya G, 快速顺序诱导期间的吸入:患病率和危险因素。《印度重症医学杂志》2021;25(2):140 - 145。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6500/7922444/19e31c99473b/ijccm-25-140-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验