Jang Minyoung, Rubin Samuel J, Stein Daniel J, Noordzij Jacob Pieter
Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Department of Otolaryngology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Nov-Dec;38(6):683-687. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
A neuropathic etiology has been suggested for patients with chronic laryngopharyngitis symptoms without visible structural pathology. Prior studies have shown that treatment with neuro-modulating medications is beneficial, but it is unknown if this was due to placebo effect. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of amitriptyline versus placebo in treating chronic laryngopharyngeal neuropathy.
Prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Patients were randomized to receive placebo or amitriptyline for 8weeks. Primary outcome was change in modified Reflux Symptom Index (mRSI) score. Secondary outcomes were change in Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI) scores, rates of adverse effects, and overall symptom severity.
Eighteen patients completed the study. The average difference in mRSI and VHI-10 scores after treatment were not significantly different between study arms. However, more subjects taking amitriptyline felt their symptoms had subjectively improved (6 out of 9, 67%), while the remainder noted no change. In the placebo group, only 4 out of 9 subjects (44%) felt their symptoms were better and 2 felt worse. Subjects took an average of 25mg of amitriptyline or placebo daily by the end of the 8-week treatment period. No serious adverse effects were noted.
Although there was a trend toward greater subjective improvement in overall symptoms with amitriptyline, interpretation is limited due to the small sample size. Larger randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy of neuro-modulating agents in the treatment of chronic laryngopharyngeal neuropathy, as well as better metrics to characterize this disorder, are warranted.
对于患有慢性喉咽炎症状但无明显结构病变的患者,有人提出其病因是神经性的。先前的研究表明,使用神经调节药物进行治疗是有益的,但尚不清楚这是否归因于安慰剂效应。我们的目的是比较阿米替林与安慰剂治疗慢性喉咽神经病变的疗效。
前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
患者被随机分配接受安慰剂或阿米替林治疗8周。主要结局是改良反流症状指数(mRSI)评分的变化。次要结局是嗓音障碍指数-10(VHI)评分的变化、不良反应发生率和总体症状严重程度。
18名患者完成了研究。治疗后,研究组之间mRSI和VHI-10评分的平均差异无统计学意义。然而,服用阿米替林的受试者中,更多人感觉其症状主观上有所改善(9人中有6人,67%),而其余人表示无变化。在安慰剂组中,9名受试者中只有4人(44%)感觉症状有所改善,2人感觉症状恶化。在8周治疗期结束时,受试者平均每天服用25mg阿米替林或安慰剂。未观察到严重不良反应。
尽管阿米替林在总体症状主观改善方面有更大的趋势,但由于样本量小,解释有限。有必要进行更大规模的随机对照试验,以确定神经调节药物治疗慢性喉咽神经病变的疗效,以及更好地表征这种疾病的指标。