Seetharamu Nagashree, Preeshagul Isabel R, Sullivan Kevin M
Monter Cancer Center, Hofstra-Northwell Health School of Medicine, Lake Success, NY, USA.
Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2017 Jul 13;8:67-78. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S113177. eCollection 2017.
The era of immunotherapy has changed the face of how we approach treatment for many oncologic and hematologic malignancies. Lung cancer has been in the forefront of checkpoint inhibition for the past 2 years and has paved the path for other subspecialties. While PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been approved for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this review focuses on atezolizumab, its landmark studies, and ongoing trials. Atezolizumab is the first programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor to receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for metastatic NSCLC patients who have progressed on frontline chemotherapy. This approval was based on two open-label Phase II multicenter trials, POPLAR (NCT01903993) and BIRCH (NCT02031458). Both studies revealed a benefit in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and response rate in the atezolizumab arm when compared to single-agent docetaxol. There were also fewest Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the atezolizumab cohort. The open-label randomized Phase III OAK trial (NCT02008227) further established the role of atezolizumab in previously treated NSCLC. This study compared atezolizumab with docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC (squamous or nonsquamous histologies) who had progressed on one to two prior chemotherapy regimens. OS in the PD-L1-enriched population was superior in the atezolizumab arm (n=241) at 15.7 months compared with docetaxel (n=222) at 10.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.93; =0.0102). Patients lacking PD-L1 also had survival benefit with atezolizumab with a median OS (mOS) of 12.6 months versus 8.9 months with chemotherapy (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.96). Benefit was noted in both squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC subsets and regardless of PD-L1 expressivity. As seen in the POPLAR and BIRCH studies, the toxicity profile was significantly better with immunotherapy. The future is unfolding rapidly as new checkpoint inhibitors are gaining FDA approval. It is still not known if these agents will be used in combination with chemotherapy, with other immune-modulating agents, radiation therapy, or all of the above. The results of these studies investigating their use in combination with chemotherapy agents, with other immunotherapy agents such as CTLA-4 inhibitors, and with radiation therapy, are eagerly awaited.
免疫疗法时代改变了我们对许多肿瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤治疗方法的面貌。在过去两年中,肺癌一直处于检查点抑制治疗的前沿,并为其他亚专业领域铺平了道路。虽然PD-1抑制剂纳武单抗和派姆单抗已被批准用于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),但本综述重点关注阿特珠单抗、其标志性研究以及正在进行的试验。阿特珠单抗是首个获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于一线化疗后病情进展的转移性NSCLC患者的程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂。该批准基于两项开放标签的II期多中心试验,即POPLAR(NCT01903993)和BIRCH(NCT02031458)。两项研究均显示,与单药多西他赛相比,阿特珠单抗组在总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期和缓解率方面具有优势。阿特珠单抗队列中3-5级治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)也最少。开放标签的随机III期OAK试验(NCT02008227)进一步确立了阿特珠单抗在既往治疗的NSCLC中的作用。本研究将阿特珠单抗与多西他赛在一至两种先前化疗方案后病情进展的晚期NSCLC(鳞状或非鳞状组织学)患者中进行了比较。在PD-L1富集人群中,阿特珠单抗组(n = 241)的OS为15.7个月,优于多西他赛组(n = 222)的10.3个月(风险比[HR] 0.74,95%置信区间[CI] 0.58 - 0.93;P = 0.0102)。缺乏PD-L1的患者使用阿特珠单抗也有生存获益,中位OS(mOS)为12.6个月,而化疗组为8.9个月(HR 0.75,95% CI 0.59 - 0.96)。在鳞状和非鳞状NSCLC亚组中均观察到获益,且与PD-L1表达无关。如在POPLAR和BIRCH研究中所见,免疫疗法的毒性特征明显更好。随着新的检查点抑制剂获得FDA批准,未来发展迅速。目前尚不清楚这些药物是否会与化疗、其他免疫调节药物、放射治疗或上述所有方法联合使用。人们热切期待这些研究将其与化疗药物、其他免疫疗法药物(如CTLA-4抑制剂)以及放射治疗联合使用的结果。