P Panhale Vrushali, Bellare Bharati, Jiandani Mariya
Department of Musculoskeletal Sciences, MGM College of Physiotherapy, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, India.
Physiotherapy School & Centre, Seth G S Medical College & KEM Hospital Parel, Mumbai, India.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jul;5(3):101-107.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of the current evidence in clinical decision making. The physiotherapy profession has expressed a commitment to the development and use of evidence. However, very little is known about the extent to which EBP is integrated in physiotherapy curricula in India. The purpose of this study was to describe integration of EBP in Indian physiotherapy programs.
An observational study was conducted where a review of curricula of all Health Science Universities (HSU) in India, offering an undergraduate (UG) and post-graduate (PG) degree program in physical therapy was conducted using a data abstraction sheet. It gathered data on inclusion of research components of EBP in the curricula, content and hours of teaching EBP, and assessment methods. Data were analyzed descriptively.
Curricula of fifteen HSU offering physiotherapy programs were reviewed. Contents relevant to EBP were incorporated from the 2 yr to final year. Common courses included research methodology (84.61%), research project (69.23%) and clinical management subjects (57.14%). No guidelines were given about adopting EBP in clinical practice. Didactic lectures were the mode of teaching (81.81%). Preferred method for assessing research projects was viva (44.44%). Ccritical appraisal was least included in the entry level education. Contents relevant to all the five steps of EBP were included in PG curricula.
Though physiotherapy programs are introducing EBP teaching at the entry level, it lacks structured systematic approach and is fragmented. There is inadequate emphasis on clinical oriented teaching of EBP and assessment methods. Moreover, there is adequate coverage of EBP content in PG curricula.
循证实践(EBP)是在临床决策中审慎、明确且明智地运用当前证据。物理治疗专业已表明致力于证据的开发与应用。然而,对于循证实践在印度物理治疗课程中的整合程度,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是描述循证实践在印度物理治疗项目中的整合情况。
开展了一项观察性研究,使用数据提取表对印度所有提供物理治疗本科和研究生学位项目的健康科学大学(HSU)的课程进行了审查。收集了关于循证实践研究组成部分在课程中的纳入情况、循证实践教学内容和时长以及评估方法的数据。对数据进行了描述性分析。
对15所提供物理治疗项目的健康科学大学的课程进行了审查。与循证实践相关的内容从二年级到最后一年都有纳入。常见课程包括研究方法(84.61%)、研究项目(69.23%)和临床管理科目(57.14%)。未给出关于在临床实践中采用循证实践的指导方针。讲授式讲座是教学方式(81.81%)。评估研究项目的首选方法是口试(44.44%)。批判性评价在入门级教育中最少涉及。与循证实践所有五个步骤相关的内容都纳入了研究生课程。
尽管物理治疗项目在入门级引入了循证实践教学,但缺乏结构化的系统方法且较为零散。对循证实践的临床导向教学以及评估方法的重视不足。此外,研究生课程中循证实践内容的覆盖较为充分。