Araras Dental School-UNIARARAS, Araras, SP, Brazil.
Department of Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0180-2. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
Craniofacial growth pattern has been correlated with variations in size of the upper airway spaces. The objective of this study was to evaluate the nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal airway spaces variations according to the craniofacial growth pattern, by comparing brachyfacial, mesofacial, and dolichofacial in Angle Class I individuals.
To measure the spaces, 45 lateral teleradiographs were used and divided into 3 groups per the craniofacial growth pattern, determined by the Tweed cephalometry angular measurements: FMA and Y-axis. To evaluate the airways, sleep apnea cephalometry was used, containing 28 points that compose 14 factors. Three groups were compared relative to each of the 14 sleep apnea cephalometry measurements. Adherence test to the normal curve was performed. For the non-normally distributed data-measurement of the inferior pharyngeal space-the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between the groups. For the remaining data, the distribution was normal and ANOVA test was used.
Statistically significant difference was verified among the groups for the measurement of the median posterior-palatal space, with the difference being pointed out by the post hoc test between the brachyfacial and dolichofacial groups. For the other measurements, there was no statistically significant difference.
It could be concluded that there was difference in the median posterior-palatal space measurement, in the oropharynx region, which was reduced for individuals with a dolichofacial pattern.
颅面生长模式与上气道空间大小的变化有关。本研究的目的是通过比较安格Ⅰ类中面型、中面型和长面型,评估鼻咽、口咽和下咽气道空间的变化。
为了测量这些空间,使用了 45 张侧位头颅远距片,并根据颅面生长模式分为 3 组,由 Tweed 头影测量的 FMA 和 Y 轴确定。为了评估气道,使用了睡眠呼吸暂停头影测量法,包含 28 个点组成的 14 个因素。比较 3 组与睡眠呼吸暂停头影测量的 14 个测量值中的每一个。进行正态曲线拟合检验。对于非正态分布的数据——下咽部空间测量值——使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行组间比较。对于其余数据,分布正常,使用方差分析检验。
在中后腭空间的测量中,组间存在显著差异,通过后验检验发现中面型和长面型组之间存在差异。对于其他测量值,没有统计学上的显著差异。
可以得出结论,在口咽区域的中后腭空间测量值存在差异,长面型个体的中后腭空间测量值减小。