Zweegman Sonja, Engelhardt Monika, Larocca Alessandra
aDepartment of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands bDepartment of Medicine I, Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany cDepartment of Hematology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Curr Opin Oncol. 2017 Sep;29(5):315-321. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000395.
To describe how to better identify frail multiple myeloma patients and to treat them appropriately.
Proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib, and immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, have significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma patients in the last decade. However, both in clinical trials and in daily clinical practice, elderly multiple myeloma patients have shown lesser benefit. This is mainly due to less stringent use of proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs, increased toxicity, and subsequent early discontinuation of therapy in elderly.
Multiple myeloma typically affects elderly patients. Approximately one-third of patients are older than 75 years at diagnosis. Moreover, at least 30% are frail, both due to disease-related symptoms and (age-related) decline in physical capacity, presence of comorbidities, frailty, polypharmacy, nutritional status, and cognitive impairment. Treatment regimens that are investigated in clinical trials for transplant-ineligible patients have largely been investigated in fit, rather than frail patients, the latter being typically excluded or highly underrepresented therein. Data on the feasibility and efficacy of current standards of care are therefore lacking in frail patients. Preliminary data suggest a higher toxicity and discontinuation rate, loss of efficacy, and impaired quality of life in frail patients. Geriatric assessment helps to identify frail patients according to their functional and cognitive status. Both the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)-frailty index and Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index constitute recently proposed algorithms that easily identify intermediate-fit and frail patients. Ongoing and future clinical trials, specifically designed for frail patients, will hopefully define frailty-directed treatment selection.
描述如何更好地识别体弱的多发性骨髓瘤患者并给予适当治疗。
蛋白酶体抑制剂,如硼替佐米、卡非佐米和伊沙佐米,以及免疫调节剂(IMiDs),如沙利度胺、来那度胺和泊马度胺,在过去十年中显著改善了多发性骨髓瘤患者的预后。然而,无论是在临床试验还是日常临床实践中,老年多发性骨髓瘤患者获益较少。这主要是由于蛋白酶体抑制剂和IMiDs的使用不够严格、毒性增加以及老年患者随后过早停药。
多发性骨髓瘤通常影响老年患者。约三分之一的患者在诊断时年龄超过75岁。此外,至少30%的患者体弱,这是由于疾病相关症状以及身体能力(与年龄相关)下降、合并症、体弱、多种药物治疗、营养状况和认知障碍所致。针对不符合移植条件患者的临床试验中所研究的治疗方案,大多是在健康而非体弱患者中进行研究的,体弱患者通常被排除在外或在其中的代表性极低。因此,体弱患者缺乏关于当前护理标准的可行性和疗效的数据。初步数据表明,体弱患者的毒性和停药率更高、疗效丧失以及生活质量受损。老年评估有助于根据患者的功能和认知状态识别体弱患者。国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)体弱指数和修订的骨髓瘤合并症指数都是最近提出的算法,可轻松识别中等健康和体弱患者。专门为体弱患者设计的正在进行的和未来的临床试验,有望确定针对体弱患者的治疗选择。