Kim Ki-Hun, Kim Dae-Kyeong, Im Hyun-Ji, Seo Jeong-Sook, Jin Han-Young, Jang Jae-Sik, Yang Tae-Hyun, Kim Dong-Soo, Jeong So-Young, Song Yun Seok, Kim Dong-Kie, Song Pil-Sang, Seol Sang-Hoon, Kim Doo-Il
Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2017 Jul;47(4):462-468. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.0371. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
The earliest atrial (A)/ventricular (V) activation potential, or accessory pathway (AP) potential are commonly used as ablation targets for atrioventricular (AV) APs. However, these targets are sometimes ambiguous.
We reviewed 119 catheter ablation cases in 112 patients diagnosed with orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) or Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Local A/V amplitude potentials with the earliest activation or AP potential were measured shortly before achieving antegrade AP conduction block, ventriculoatrial block during right ventricle (RV) pacing, or AVRT termination with no AP conduction.
APs were located in the left lateral (55.5%), left posterior (17.6%), left posteroseptal (10.1%), midseptal (1.7%), right posteroseptal (7.6%), right posterior (1.7%), and right lateral (5.9%) regions. The mean earliest activation time was 16.7±15.5 ms, mean A/V potential was 1.1±0.9/1.0±0.9 mV, and mean A/V ratio was 1.7±2.0. There was no statistically significant difference between the activation methods (antegrade vs. RV pacing vs. orthodromic AVRT) or AP locations (left vs. right atrium). However, when the local A/V ratio was divided into 3 groups (≤0.6, 1.0±0.3, and ≥1.4), the antegrade approach resulted in an A/V ratio greater than 1.0±0.3 (86.7%, p=0.007), and the orthodromic AVRT state resulted in a ratio of less than 1.0±0.3 (87.5%, p<0.001).
The mean local A/V potential and ratio did not differ by activation method or AP location. However, a different A/V ratio based on activation method (≥1.0±0.3, antegrade approach; and ≤1.0±0.3, orthodromic AVRT state) could be a good adjuvant marker for targeting AV APs.
最早的心房(A)/心室(V)激动电位或旁路(AP)电位通常用作房室(AV)旁路的消融靶点。然而,这些靶点有时并不明确。
我们回顾了112例诊断为顺向型房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)或预激综合征(WPW)患者的119例导管消融病例。在实现前传AP传导阻滞、右心室(RV)起搏时的室房阻滞或无AP传导的AVRT终止前不久,测量具有最早激动或AP电位的局部A/V振幅电位。
旁路位于左侧(55.5%)、左后(17.6%)、左后间隔(10.1%)、中间隔(1.7%)、右后间隔(7.6%)、右后(1.7%)和右侧(5.9%)区域。平均最早激动时间为16.7±15.5毫秒,平均A/V电位为1.1±0.9/1.0±0.9毫伏,平均A/V比值为1.7±2.0。激动方法(前传与RV起搏与顺向型AVRT)或AP位置(左心房与右心房)之间无统计学显著差异。然而,当将局部A/V比值分为3组(≤0.6、1.0±0.3和≥1.4)时,前传方法导致A/V比值大于1.0±0.3(86.7%,p=0.007),顺向型AVRT状态导致比值小于1.0±0.3(87.5%,p<0.001)。
平均局部A/V电位和比值不因激动方法或AP位置而异。然而,基于激动方法的不同A/V比值(≥1.0±0.3,前传方法;≤1.0±0.3,顺向型AVRT状态)可能是靶向AV旁路的良好辅助标志物。