Van Son M A C, De Vries J, Zijlstra W, Roukema J A, Gosens T, Verhofstad M H J, Den Oudsten B L
CoRPS, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Qual Life Res. 2017 Dec;26(12):3251-3265. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1670-x. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
This prospective study aimed to identify the different trajectories of quality of life (QOL) in patients with distal radius fractures (DRF) and ankle fractures (AF). Secondly, it was examined if subgroups could be characterized by sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables.
Patients (n = 543) completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref), the pain, coping, and cognitions questionnaire, NEO-five factor inventory (neuroticism and extraversion), and the state-trait anxiety inventory (short version) a few days after fracture (i.e., pre-injury QOL reported). The WHOQOL-Bref was also completed at three, six, and 12 months post-fracture. Latent class trajectory analysis (i.e., regression model) including the Step 3 method was performed in Latent Gold 5.0.
The number of classes ranged from three to five for the WHOQOL-Bref facet and the four domains with a total variance explained ranging from 71.6 to 79.4%. Sex was only significant for physical and psychological QOL (p < 0.05), whereas age showed significance for overall, physical, psychological, and environmental QOL (p < 0.05). Type of treatment or fracture type was not significant (p > 0.05). Percentages of chronic comorbidities were 1.8 (i.e., social QOL) to 4.5 (i.e., physical QOL) higher in the lowest compared to the highest QOL classes. Trait anxiety, neuroticism, extraversion, pain catastrophizing, and internal pain locus of control were significantly different between QOL trajectories (p < 0.05).
The importance of a biopsychosocial model in trauma care was confirmed. The different courses of QOL after fracture were defined by several sociodemographic and clinical variables as well as psychological characteristics. Based on the identified characteristics, patients at risk for lower QOL may be recognized earlier by health care providers offering opportunities for monitoring and intervention.
这项前瞻性研究旨在确定桡骨远端骨折(DRF)和踝关节骨折(AF)患者生活质量(QOL)的不同轨迹。其次,研究是否可以通过社会人口统计学、临床和心理变量对亚组进行特征描述。
患者(n = 543)在骨折后几天(即报告受伤前的生活质量)完成了世界卫生组织生活质量评估工具简表(WHOQOL-Bref)、疼痛、应对和认知问卷、NEO五因素问卷(神经质和外向性)以及状态-特质焦虑量表(简版)。骨折后3个月、6个月和12个月也完成了WHOQOL-Bref。在Latent Gold 5.0中进行了包括第三步方法的潜在类别轨迹分析(即回归模型)。
WHOQOL-Bref方面和四个领域的类别数量从三个到五个不等,总方差解释范围为71.6%至79.4%。性别仅对身体和心理生活质量有显著影响(p < 0.05),而年龄对总体、身体、心理和环境生活质量有显著影响(p < 0.05)。治疗类型或骨折类型不显著(p > 0.05)。与最高生活质量类别相比,最低生活质量类别中的慢性合并症百分比在社会生活质量方面高1.8%,在身体生活质量方面高4.5%。特质焦虑、神经质、外向性、疼痛灾难化和内部疼痛控制源在生活质量轨迹之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。
生物心理社会模型在创伤护理中的重要性得到了证实。骨折后生活质量的不同进程由几个社会人口统计学和临床变量以及心理特征所定义。基于所确定的特征,医疗保健提供者可以更早地识别生活质量较低风险的患者,从而提供监测和干预的机会。