Division of Healthcare Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Nov;32(11):1193-1201. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4127-6. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Implicit and explicit bias among providers can influence the quality of healthcare. Efforts to address sexual orientation bias in new physicians are hampered by a lack of knowledge of school factors that influence bias among students.
To determine whether medical school curriculum, role modeling, diversity climate, and contact with sexual minorities predict bias among graduating students against gay and lesbian people.
Prospective cohort study.
A sample of 4732 first-year medical students was recruited from a stratified random sample of 49 US medical schools in the fall of 2010 (81% response; 55% of eligible), of which 94.5% (4473) identified as heterosexual. Seventy-eight percent of baseline respondents (3492) completed a follow-up survey in their final semester (spring 2014).
Medical school predictors included formal curriculum, role modeling, diversity climate, and contact with sexual minorities. Outcomes were year 4 implicit and explicit bias against gay men and lesbian women, adjusted for bias at year 1.
In multivariate models, lower explicit bias against gay men and lesbian women was associated with more favorable contact with LGBT faculty, residents, students, and patients, and perceived skill and preparedness for providing care to LGBT patients. Greater explicit bias against lesbian women was associated with discrimination reported by sexual minority students (b = 1.43 [0.16, 2.71]; p = 0.03). Lower implicit sexual orientation bias was associated with more frequent contact with LGBT faculty, residents, students, and patients (b = -0.04 [-0.07, -0.01); p = 0.008). Greater implicit bias was associated with more faculty role modeling of discriminatory behavior (b = 0.34 [0.11, 0.57); p = 0.004).
Medical schools may reduce bias against sexual minority patients by reducing negative role modeling, improving the diversity climate, and improving student preparedness to care for this population.
医疗服务提供者的内隐和外显偏见会影响医疗质量。尽管新医生的性取向偏见问题已引起重视,但由于缺乏了解影响医学生偏见的学校因素,相关工作受到阻碍。
确定医学院课程、榜样示范、多样性氛围和与性少数群体的接触是否可以预测即将毕业的学生对同性恋者的偏见。
前瞻性队列研究。
从 2010 年秋季的 49 所美国医学院中分层随机抽取的 4732 名一年级医学生组成样本(回应率为 81%,符合条件者中有 55%参与),其中 94.5%(4473 人)自认为是异性恋。78%的基线应答者(3492 人)在最后一个学期(2014 年春季)完成了后续调查。
医学院的预测因素包括正式课程、榜样示范、多样性氛围和与性少数群体的接触。结果是第 4 年对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的内隐和外显偏见,调整了第 1 年的偏见。
多元模型分析显示,对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的外显偏见降低与对 LGBT 教师、住院医师、学生和患者的接触更多、对为 LGBT 患者提供护理的技能和准备程度更高有关。对女同性恋者的外显偏见增加与性少数学生报告的歧视有关(b=1.43[0.16,2.71];p=0.03)。较低的内隐性取向偏见与与 LGBT 教师、住院医师、学生和患者接触更频繁有关(b=-0.04[-0.07,-0.01];p=0.008)。更大的内隐偏见与更多的教师榜样示范歧视行为有关(b=0.34[0.11,0.57];p=0.004)。
医学院可以通过减少消极的榜样示范、改善多样性氛围以及提高学生为这一人群提供护理的准备程度,来减少对性少数患者的偏见。