Burke Sara E, Dovidio John F, Przedworski Julia M, Hardeman Rachel R, Perry Sylvia P, Phelan Sean M, Nelson David B, Burgess Diana J, Yeazel Mark W, van Ryn Michelle
S.E. Burke is a doctoral candidate, Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. J.F. Dovidio is Carl Iver Hovland Professor, Department of Psychology, Yale School of Public Health, and Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. J.M. Przedworski is a doctoral student and National Cancer Institute predoctoral fellow, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. R.R. Hardeman is research associate, University of Minnesota Department of Medicine, and associated health postdoctoral fellow, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. S.P. Perry is assistant professor, Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. S.M. Phelan is assistant professor, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. D.B. Nelson is core investigator and senior statistician, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and associate professor, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. D.J. Burgess is core investigator, Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and associate professor, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. M.W. Yeazel is associate professor, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. M. van Ryn is professor, Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and director, Research Program on Equity and Quality of Patient-Provider Encounters, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):645-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000661.
A recent Institute of Medicine report concluded that lesbian and gay individuals face discrimination from health care providers and called for research on provider attitudes. Medical school is a critical juncture for improving future providers' treatment of sexual minorities. This study examined both explicit bias and implicit bias against lesbian women and gay men among first-year medical students, focusing on two predictors of such bias, contact and empathy.
This study included the 4,441 heterosexual first-year medical students who participated in the baseline survey of the Medical Student Cognitive Habits and Growth Evaluation Study, which employed a stratified random sample of 49 U.S. medical schools in fall 2010. The researchers measured explicit attitudes toward gay and lesbian people using feeling thermometer self-assessments, implicit attitudes using the Implicit Association Test, amount and favorability of contact using self-report items, and empathy using subscales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index.
Nearly half (45.79%; 956/2,088) of respondents with complete data on both bias measures expressed at least some explicit bias, and most (81.51%; 1,702/2,088) exhibited at least some implicit bias against gay and lesbian individuals. Both amount and favorability of contact predicted positive implicit and explicit attitudes. Both cognitive and emotional empathy predicted positive explicit attitudes, but not implicit attitudes.
The prevalence of negative attitudes presents an important challenge for medical education, highlighting the need for more research on possible causes of bias. Findings on contact and empathy point to possible curriculum-based interventions aimed at ensuring high-quality care for sexual minorities.
医学研究所最近的一份报告得出结论,女同性恋者和男同性恋者面临来自医疗服务提供者的歧视,并呼吁对提供者的态度进行研究。医学院校是改善未来医疗服务提供者对性少数群体治疗的关键节点。本研究调查了一年级医学生对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的显性偏见和隐性偏见,重点关注这种偏见的两个预测因素,即接触和同理心。
本研究纳入了参加医学生认知习惯与成长评估研究基线调查的4441名异性恋一年级医学生,该研究于2010年秋季在美国49所医学院校采用分层随机抽样。研究人员使用情感温度计自我评估来测量对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的显性态度,使用内隐联想测验来测量隐性态度,使用自我报告项目来测量接触的数量和好感度,使用人际反应指数的子量表来测量同理心。
在两项偏见测量指标上都有完整数据的受访者中,近一半(45.79%;956/2088)表现出至少一些显性偏见,大多数(81.51%;1702/2088)对男同性恋者和女同性恋者表现出至少一些隐性偏见。接触的数量和好感度都预测了积极的隐性和显性态度。认知同理心和情感同理心都预测了积极的显性态度,但没有预测隐性态度。
负面态度的普遍存在对医学教育构成了重大挑战,凸显了对偏见可能原因进行更多研究的必要性。关于接触和同理心的研究结果指出了可能基于课程的干预措施,旨在确保为性少数群体提供高质量的护理。