• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神能力法案》:“最大利益”——文献综述

The Mental Capacity Act: 'Best interests'-a review of the literature.

作者信息

Marshall Helen, Sprung Sally

机构信息

Helen Marshall, Safeguarding Adults Specialist Nurse, Liverpool Community Health NHS Community Healthcare Trust.

Senior Lecturer, Liverpool John Moores University UK, School of Nursing and Allied Health; Member of the Association of District Nurse Educators.

出版信息

Br J Community Nurs. 2017 Aug 2;22(8):384-390. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.8.384.

DOI:10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.8.384
PMID:28767299
Abstract

The Mental Capacity Act (MCA) is statutory legislation introduced in 2007 in order to provide a consistent, robust framework with the aim to protect and empower people to make decisions themselves. However, an assessment as per the MCA may demonstrate that a person is lacking mental capacity and therefore unable to make an autonomous decision at the time it needs to be made. In this case, a 'best interests' decision may be made on their behalf, ensuring their wishes and beliefs are at the centre of the decision-making process. When making a best interests decision, a health practitioner must follow the guidance as set out in the MCA legislation to ensure fair and consistent approaches to safeguard and provide assurance that the outcome is truly the best decision for the individual. This review of the literature supports the findings of a 2014 post-legislative review by the House of Lords, which concluded the principles of the MCA are not sufficiently embedded into the practice of all health practitioners, due to a lack of knowledge, awareness and understanding. However, the evidence base also appreciates making a decision on behalf of another person can be a stressful, complex and intricate process when further support may be required from the wider multidisciplinary team, including potentially seeking legal advice.

摘要

《精神能力法案》(MCA)是2007年出台的一项成文法,旨在提供一个连贯、有力的框架,以保护人们并使其有能力自行做出决定。然而,根据《精神能力法案》进行的评估可能表明,一个人缺乏精神能力,因此在需要做出决定时无法自主做出决定。在这种情况下,可以代表他们做出“最符合其利益”的决定,确保他们的意愿和信念处于决策过程的核心。在做出最符合其利益的决定时,医疗从业者必须遵循《精神能力法案》立法中规定的指导方针,以确保采取公平、一致的方法进行保障,并确保结果确实是对个人最有利的决定。本次文献综述支持了上议院2014年立法后审查的结果,该审查得出结论,由于缺乏知识、意识和理解,《精神能力法案》的原则并未充分融入所有医疗从业者的实践中。然而,证据基础也认识到,当可能需要来自更广泛的多学科团队的进一步支持(包括可能寻求法律咨询)时,代表他人做出决定可能是一个压力大、复杂且棘手的过程。

相似文献

1
The Mental Capacity Act: 'Best interests'-a review of the literature.《精神能力法案》:“最大利益”——文献综述
Br J Community Nurs. 2017 Aug 2;22(8):384-390. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.8.384.
2
The Mental Capacity Act: a review of the current literature.
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Aug 2;21(8):406-10. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.8.406.
3
Community nurse's knowledge, confidence and experience of the Mental Capacity Act in practice.社区护士在实践中对《精神能力法案》的知识、信心和经验。
Br J Community Nurs. 2016 Dec 2;21(12):615-622. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.12.615.
4
WHAT ARE 'BEST INTERESTS'? A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF 'BEST INTERESTS' DECISION-MAKING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE.什么是“最佳利益”?对临床实践中“最佳利益”决策的批判性评估。
Med Law Rev. 2016 Spring;24(2):176-205. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww007. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
5
Multidisciplinary palliative care teams' understanding of Mental Capacity Act 2005 'best interest' determinations.多学科姑息治疗团队对《2005年精神能力法案》“最佳利益”判定的理解。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2011 Jan;17(1):20-5. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2011.17.1.20.
6
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 and decision-making: best interests.《2005年精神能力法案》与决策:最佳利益
Br J Nurs. 2007;16(19):1208-10. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.19.27359.
7
Understanding mental capacity law and making best-interests decisions.理解精神能力法并做出符合最大利益的决策。
Nurs Stand. 2016 Nov 30;31(14):54-63. doi: 10.7748/ns.2016.e10652.
8
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 best interests test as applied to the elderly - is it fit for purpose?
Med Leg J. 2018 Sep;86(3):142-146. doi: 10.1177/0025817217749521. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
9
Best interests decisions: professional practices in health and social care.符合患者最佳利益的决策:健康与社会照护中的专业实践
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jan;22(1):78-86. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12066. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
10
Making healthcare decisions in a person's best interests when they lack capacity: clinical guidance based on a review of evidence.在患者缺乏能力时为其做出符合最佳利益的医疗保健决策:基于证据综述的临床指南。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Oct;33(10):1571-1585. doi: 10.1177/0269215519852987. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Embedding into the ways of working in the NHS: A seamless transition and reflective learning as a clinical observer in general internal medicine.融入英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的工作方式:作为普通内科临床观察员的无缝过渡与反思性学习。
Future Healthc J. 2025 Jan 10;12(1):100222. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100222. eCollection 2025 Mar.