Hall Alison K, Mills Sherry L, Lund P Kay
A.K. Hall was deputy director, Division of Training, Workforce Development, and Diversity, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, at the time this work was completed. She is now associate dean of research workforce development, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC. S.L. Mills is director, Office of Extramural Programs, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. P.K. Lund is director, Division of Biomedical Research Workforce, Office of Extramural Programs, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1382-1389. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001859.
Clinician-investigators, also called physician-scientists, offer critical knowledge and perspectives that benefit research on basic science mechanisms, improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, population and outcomes medicine, health policy, and health services, yet few clinically trained health professionals pursue a research career. Sustaining this workforce requires attention to the unique challenges faced by investigators who must achieve clinical and research competence during training and their careers. These challenges include the duration of required clinical training, limited or discontinuous research opportunities, high levels of educational debt, balancing the dual obligations and rewards of clinical care and research, competition for research funding, and the need for leadership development after training. Women and individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups comprise a small percentage of this workforce.The authors summarize the recent literature on training for clinician-investigators, emphasizing approaches with encouraging outcomes that warrant broader implementation. Using this overview as background, they convened three workshops at the National Institutes of Health in 2016 to identify and refine key priorities for potential new pilot programs to recruit and retain the clinician-investigator workforce. From these workshops emerged three priorities for future pilot programs: (1) support for research in residency, (2) new research on-ramps for health professionals at multiple career stages, and (3) national networks to diversify and sustain clinician-investigator faculty. Implementation of any pilot program will require coordinated commitment from academic health centers, medical licensing/certification boards, professional societies, and clinician-investigators themselves, in addition to support from the National Institutes of Health.
临床研究人员,也被称为医学科学家,他们提供的关键知识和观点有助于基础科学机制研究、改进诊断和治疗方法、人群与结果医学、卫生政策以及卫生服务等方面的研究,但很少有接受过临床培训的卫生专业人员从事研究工作。维持这一人才队伍需要关注研究人员所面临的独特挑战,这些研究人员必须在培训期间及其职业生涯中同时具备临床和研究能力。这些挑战包括所需临床培训的时长、有限或不连续的研究机会、高额的教育债务、平衡临床护理和研究的双重义务与回报、研究资金的竞争,以及培训后领导力发展的需求。女性以及来自代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的个人在这一人才队伍中所占比例较小。作者总结了近期关于临床研究人员培训的文献,强调了那些取得了令人鼓舞的成果、值得更广泛实施的方法。以这一概述为背景,他们于2016年在美国国立卫生研究院举办了三场研讨会,以确定并完善潜在新试点项目的关键优先事项,从而招募和留住临床研究人员队伍。从这些研讨会中得出了未来试点项目的三个优先事项:(1)支持住院医师阶段的研究;(2)为处于多个职业阶段的卫生专业人员设立新的研究入门途径;(3)建立全国性网络,以使临床研究人员师资队伍多样化并维持其规模。除了美国国立卫生研究院的支持外,任何试点项目的实施都需要学术健康中心、医学许可/认证委员会、专业协会以及临床研究人员自身的共同承诺。