Mansholt Barbara A, Salsbury Stacie A, Corber Lance G, Stites John S
J Chiropr Educ. 2017 Oct;31(2):140-163. doi: 10.7899/JCE-17-4. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Scientific literature applicable to chiropractic practice proliferates in quantity, quality, and source. Chiropractic is a worldwide profession and varies in scope between states or provinces and from country to country. It is logical to consider that the focus and emphasis of chiropractic education varies between programs as well. This original research study endeavored to determine "essential literature" recommended by chiropractic faculty. The purpose of this article is (1) to share our results and (2) to promote discussion and explore means for future collaboration of chiropractic faculty through a worldwide platform.
A 2-phase recruitment occurred initially at the institutional level and subsequently at the faculty level. A Web-based survey used qualitative data collection methods to gather bibliographic citations. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics, and citation responses were ranked per number of recommendations, grouped into categories, and tabulated per journal source and publication date.
Forty-one chiropractic programs were contacted, resulting in 30 participating chiropractic programs (16 US and 14 international). Forty-five faculty members completed the entire survey, submitting 126 peer-reviewed publications and 25 additional citations. Readings emphasized clinical management of spine pain, the science of spinal manipulation, effectiveness of manual therapies, teaching of chiropractic techniques, outcomes assessments, and professional issues.
A systematic approach to surveying educators in international chiropractic institutions was accomplished. The results of the survey provide a list of essential literature for the chiropractic profession. We recommend establishing a chiropractic faculty registry for improved communication and collaboration.
适用于整脊疗法实践的科学文献在数量、质量和来源上都在激增。整脊疗法是一项全球性的专业,在不同州或省份以及不同国家之间,其范围有所不同。可以合理地认为,整脊疗法教育的重点和侧重点在不同课程之间也存在差异。这项原创性研究旨在确定整脊疗法教员推荐的“重要文献”。本文的目的是:(1)分享我们的研究结果;(2)通过一个全球平台促进讨论,并探索整脊疗法教员未来合作的方式。
分两个阶段进行招募,首先在机构层面,随后在教员层面。一项基于网络的调查采用定性数据收集方法来收集文献引用。计算了人口统计学的描述性统计数据,引用回复按推荐次数排名,分类分组,并按期刊来源和出版日期制成表格。
联系了41个整脊疗法课程,有30个整脊疗法课程参与(16个美国的和14个国际的)。45名教员完成了整个调查,提交了126篇同行评审出版物和25条其他引用。阅读材料强调了脊柱疼痛的临床管理、脊柱推拿科学、手法治疗的有效性、整脊疗法技术教学、结果评估以及专业问题。
完成了对国际整脊疗法机构教育工作者进行调查的系统方法。调查结果提供了一份整脊疗法专业的重要文献清单。我们建议建立一个整脊疗法教员登记册,以改善沟通与合作。