Saline Enemas versus Glycerin Suppositories to Promote Enteral Feeding in Premature Infants: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND

Meconium retention is associated with feeding intolerance. Trials using glycerol and Gastrografin to expedite the evacuation of meconium have failed to generate clinically valid results for efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the feasibility of aggressive meconium evacuation with saline rectal washout (RW) in very-low-birth-weight infants to reduce the time it took them to reach full enteral feeds.

METHODS

We conducted an open-label, pilot, randomized controlled trial (RCT) (birth weight stratified, i.e., to 750-999 g and 1,000-1,500 g) of early aggressive meconium evacuation with twice-daily normal saline RW compared to conventional management with glycerin suppositories (GS), until full enteral feeds (110 mL/kg/day) were reached. Primary outcome was time to reach full enteral feeds. Safety, process, and secondary efficacy outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-one infants were randomized, 28 to RW and 33 to GS. The process and feasibility outcomes were met. RW was found to be safe; none of the RW-randomized infants developed necrotizing enterocolitis (≥ stage II) or complications secondary to RW. Evidence of efficacy was supported: in the 750-999 g stratum (n = 15), the median time to full enteral feeds was shorter with RW (11.0 days, 95% CI: 10.4-11.6) than with GS (15.6 days, 95% CI: 13.0-18.2) by a reduction of 4.6 days (p = 0.027). In the 1,000-1,500 g stratum (n = 46), there was no evidence of benefit: RW 10.2 days (95% CI 8.3-12.1) and GS 10.1 days (95% CI 9.3-10.9, p = 0.304).

CONCLUSION

Our protocol was feasible and an adequately powered RCT is required to confirm the findings of this trial.