Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Spine J. 2017 Nov;26(11):2773-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5222-4. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is performed to treat rigid, sagittal spinal deformities, but high rates of implant failure are reported. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion has been proposed to reduce this risk, but biomechanical investigation is lacking. The goal of this study was to quantify the (1) destabilizing effects of a lumbar osteotomy and (2) contribution of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at the lumbosacral junction as recommended in literature.
Fourteen fresh human thoracolumbosacral spines (T12-S1) were tested in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Bilateral pedicle screws/rods (BPS) were inserted at T12-S1, cross connectors (CC) at T12-L1 and L5-S1, and anterior interbody spacers (S) at L4-5 and L5-S1. In one group, PSO was performed in seven specimens at L3. All specimens were sequentially tested in (1) Intact; (2) BPS; (3) BPS + CC; (4) BPS + S; and (5) BPS + S + CC; a second group of seven spines were tested in the same sequence without PSO. Mixed-model ANOVA with repeated measures was performed (p ≤ 0.05).
At the osteotomy site (L2-L4), in FE, BPS, BPS + CC, BPS + S, BPS + CC + S reduced motion to 11.2, 12.9, 10.9, and 11.4%, respectively, with significance only found in BPS and BPS + S construction (p ≤ 0.05). All constructs significantly reduced motion across L2-L4 in the absence of PSO, across all loading modes (p ≤ 0.05). PSO significantly destabilized L2-L4 axial rotational stability, regardless of operative construction (p ≤ 0.05). Across L4-S1 and L2-S1, all instrumented constructs significantly reduced motion, in both PSO- and non-PSO groups, during all loading modes (p ≤ 0.05).
These findings suggest anterior interbody fusion minimally immobilizes motion segments, and interbody devices may primarily act to maintain disc height. Additionally, lumbar osteotomy destabilizes axial rotational stability at the osteotomy site, potentially further increasing mechanical demand on posterior instrumentation. Clinical studies are needed to assess the impact of this treatment strategy.
经椎弓根截骨术(PSO)用于治疗僵硬的矢状位脊柱畸形,但报道的植入物失败率很高。前路腰椎体间融合术已被提议用于降低这种风险,但缺乏生物力学研究。本研究的目的是定量分析(1)腰椎截骨术的不稳定效应,以及(2)文献推荐的前路腰椎体间融合术(ALIF)在腰骶连接处的作用。
对 14 具新鲜胸腰椎骶骨(T12-S1)进行屈伸(FE)、侧屈(LB)和轴向旋转(AR)测试。在 T12-S1 处插入双侧椎弓根螺钉/棒(BPS),在 T12-L1 和 L5-S1 处插入交叉连接器(CC),在 L4-5 和 L5-S1 处插入前路椎间融合器(S)。在一组中,在 7 个标本的 L3 处进行 PSO。所有标本依次进行(1)完整;(2)BPS;(3)BPS+CC;(4)BPS+S;和(5)BPS+S+CC;第二组 7 个脊柱按相同顺序进行测试,但不进行 PSO。采用重复测量混合模型方差分析(p≤0.05)。
在截骨部位(L2-L4),在 FE 中,BPS、BPS+CC、BPS+S、BPS+CC+S 分别使运动减少至 11.2%、12.9%、10.9%和 11.4%,仅在 BPS 和 BPS+S 结构中具有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。所有结构在没有 PSO 的情况下,在所有加载模式下都显著减少了 L2-L4 的运动(p≤0.05)。PSO 显著降低了 L2-L4 轴向旋转稳定性,与手术结构无关(p≤0.05)。在 L4-S1 和 L2-S1 处,所有仪器化结构在 PSO 和非 PSO 组中,在所有加载模式下,均显著减少了运动(p≤0.05)。
这些发现表明前路椎间融合术对运动节段的固定作用最小,椎间融合器可能主要起到维持椎间盘高度的作用。此外,腰椎截骨术会破坏截骨部位的轴向旋转稳定性,可能会进一步增加后路器械的机械需求。需要进行临床研究来评估这种治疗策略的影响。