Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素AT1受体阻滞剂在高血压患者早期治疗中的益处。

The benefit of angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers for early treatment of hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Trimarco Bruno, Santoro Ciro, Pepe Marco, Galderisi Maurizio

机构信息

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Via S. Pansini 5, bld 1, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Dipartimento Medico e Chirurgico di Cuore e Vasi, Casa di Cura San Michele, Maddaloni, Caserta, Italy.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;12(8):1093-1099. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1713-x. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Abstract

ESC guidelines for management of arterial hypertension allow one to choose among five classes of antihypertensive drugs indiscriminately. They are based on the principle that in the management of hypertensive patients, it is fundamental to reduce blood pressure (BP), independently of the utilized drug. However, it has been demonstrated that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a relevant role in the hypertensive-derived development and progression of organ damage. Thus, antihypertensive drugs interfering with the RAS should be preferred in preventing and reducing target organ damage. The availability of two classes of drugs, ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs), both interfering with the RAS, makes the choice between them difficult. Both pharmacological strategies offer an effective BP control, and a substantial improvement of prognosis in different associated pathologies. Regarding cardiovascular prevention, ACE-inhibitors have an extensive scientific literature regarding utility in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, there is evidence to support the concept that in the early phases of organ tissue damage, the RAS is activated, but the ACE pathway producing angiotensin II is not always employed. Accordingly, ACE-inhibitors appear to be less effective, whereas ARBs have a greater beneficial action in the initial stages of atherosclerotic disease. Moreover, patients undergoing ARBs therapy show a substantially lower risk of therapy discontinuation when compared to those treated with ACE-inhibitors, because of a better tolerability. In conclusion, ACE-inhibitors should be used in patients who have already developed organ damage, but tolerate this drug well, while ARBs should be the first choice in naïve hypertensive patients without organ damage or at the initial stages of disease.

摘要

欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)动脉高血压管理指南允许人们在五类抗高血压药物中不加区分地进行选择。这些指南基于这样一个原则:在高血压患者的管理中,降低血压是根本,而与所使用的药物无关。然而,已经证明肾素 - 血管紧张素系统(RAS)在高血压引发的器官损害的发生和发展中起相关作用。因此,在预防和减少靶器官损害方面,应优先选择干扰RAS的抗高血压药物。两类药物,即血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE抑制剂)和血管紧张素AT1受体阻滞剂(ARB),都干扰RAS,这使得在它们之间做出选择变得困难。这两种药理学策略都能有效控制血压,并在不同的相关病症中显著改善预后。关于心血管预防,ACE抑制剂在高危患者中的应用有大量科学文献。然而,有证据支持这样的观点:在器官组织损伤的早期阶段,RAS被激活,但产生血管紧张素II的ACE途径并不总是被采用。因此,ACE抑制剂似乎效果较差,而ARB在动脉粥样硬化疾病的初始阶段具有更大的有益作用。此外,与接受ACE抑制剂治疗的患者相比,接受ARB治疗的患者停药风险显著更低,因为其耐受性更好。总之,ACE抑制剂应用于已经发生器官损害但对该药物耐受性良好的患者,而ARB应该是无器官损害的初发高血压患者或疾病初始阶段患者的首选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验