Chang Megan, Sielaff Alan, Bradin Stuart, Walker Kevin, Ambrose Michael, Hashikawa Andrew
From the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatric and Communicable Diseases, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
South Med J. 2017 Aug;110(8):502-508. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000678.
Children's summer camps are at risk for multiple pediatric casualties during a disaster. The degree to which summer camps have instituted disaster preparedness is unknown. We assessed disaster preparedness among selected camps nationally for a range of disasters.
We partnered with a national, web-based electronic health records system to send camp leadership of 315 camp organizations a 14-question online survey of disaster preparedness. One response from each camp was selected in the following order of importance: owner, director, physician, nurse, medical technician, office staff, and other. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
A total of 181 camps responses were received, 169 of which were complete. Camp types were overnight (60%), day (21%), special/medical needs (14%), and other (5%). Survey respondents were directors (52%), nurses (14%), office staff (10%), physicians (5%), owners (5%), emergency medical technicians (2%), and other (12%). Almost 18% of camps were located >20 mi from a major medical center, and 36% were >5 mi from police/fire departments. Many camps were missing emergency supplies: car/booster seats for evacuation (68%), shelter (35%), vehicles for evacuation (26%), quarantine isolation areas (21%), or emergency supplies of extra water (20%) or food (17%). Plans were unavailable for the following: power outages (23%); lockdowns (15%); illness outbreaks (15%); tornadoes (11%); evacuation for fire, flood, or chemical spill (9%); and other severe weather (8%). Many camps did not have online emergency plans (53%), plans for children with special/medical needs (38%), methods to rapidly communicate information to parents (25%), or methods to identify children for evacuation/reunification with parents (40%). Respondents reported that staff participation in disaster drills varied for weather (58%), evacuations (46%), and lockdowns (36%). The majority (75%) of respondents had not collaborated with medical organizations for planning.
A substantial proportion of camps were missing critical components of disaster planning. Future interventions must focus on developing summer camp-specific disaster plans, increasing partnerships, and reassessing national disaster plans to include summer camp settings.
儿童夏令营在灾难期间面临多名儿童伤亡的风险。夏令营制定灾难防范措施的程度尚不清楚。我们评估了全国范围内选定营地针对一系列灾难的灾难防范情况。
我们与一个基于网络的全国性电子健康记录系统合作,向315个营地组织的营地负责人发送了一份包含14个问题的灾难防范在线调查问卷。每个营地按以下重要性顺序选择一份回复:所有者、主任、医生、护士、医疗技术人员、办公室工作人员及其他人员。使用描述性统计分析结果。
共收到181份营地回复,其中169份完整。营地类型包括过夜营地(60%)、日间营地(21%)、特殊/医疗需求营地(14%)及其他营地(5%)。调查对象包括主任(52%)、护士(14%)、办公室工作人员(10%)、医生(5%)、所有者(5%)、急救医疗技术人员(2%)及其他人员(12%)。近18%的营地距离主要医疗中心超过20英里,36%的营地距离警察/消防部门超过5英里。许多营地缺少应急物资:用于疏散的汽车/增高座椅(68%)、避难所(35%)、疏散车辆(26%)、隔离区(21%)或额外的应急用水(20%)或食物(17%)。以下情况没有相关计划:停电(23%);封锁(15%);疾病爆发(15%);龙卷风(11%);火灾、洪水或化学泄漏时的疏散(9%);以及其他恶劣天气(8%)。许多营地没有在线应急计划(53%)、针对有特殊/医疗需求儿童的计划(38%)、迅速向家长传达信息的方法(25%)或识别需要疏散/与家长团聚儿童的方法(40%)。受访者表示,工作人员参与灾难演练的情况因天气(58%)、疏散(46%)和封锁(36%)而有所不同。大多数(75%)受访者未与医疗组织合作进行规划。
很大一部分营地缺少灾难规划的关键要素。未来的干预措施必须侧重于制定针对夏令营的灾难计划、加强合作关系以及重新评估国家灾难计划以纳入夏令营场景。