Philipose K J, Bhalla V P, Kannan N, Tandon S
Senior Advisor (Surgery), Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt 110010.
Reader, Department of Surgery, Armed Forces MEdical College, Pune 411 040.
Med J Armed Forces India. 1998 Jul;54(3):212-214. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(17)30545-2. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
A comparative study of early vs delayed cholecystectomy was conducted on 51 patients who presented with acute cholecystitis. Ultrasonography was accurate in diagnosing all cases of acute cholecystitis. Twenty four patients were managed by early surgery performed between 24 and 72 hours of onset of symptoms. Twenty seven were managed by delayed cholecystectomy between 8 weeks and 6 months of the acute episode. Early surgery required a longer operating time (120 +/- 15 minutes vs 90 +/- 15 minutes), more skill and had a marginally higher operative blood loss (150 vs 100ml). Early surgery did not after the decision or outcome of bile duct exploration. There were no fatalities or major complications. The total hospital stay was reduced in the early surgery group (10 vs 18 days). The study confirms the advantage of early cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.
对51例急性胆囊炎患者进行了早期与延迟胆囊切除术的对比研究。超声检查对所有急性胆囊炎病例的诊断均准确。24例患者在症状出现后24至72小时内接受早期手术治疗。27例患者在急性发作后8周与6个月之间接受延迟胆囊切除术。早期手术需要更长的手术时间(120±15分钟对90±15分钟)、更多的技巧,且术中失血量略多(150对100毫升)。早期手术不影响胆管探查的决策或结果。无死亡病例或重大并发症。早期手术组的总住院时间缩短(10天对18天)。该研究证实了早期胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的优势。