Soria Aledo Víctor, Galindo Iñíguez Lorena, Flores Funes Diego, Carrasco Prats Milagros, Aguayo Albasini Jose Luis
Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Morales Meseguer, España.
Universidad de Murcia.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017 Oct;109(10):708-718. doi: 10.17235/reed.2017.4902/2017.
There is currently no consensus with regard to the use of cholecystectomy or percutaneous cholecystostomy as the therapy of choice for acute acalculous cholecystitis. The goal of this study was to review the scientific evidence on the management of these patients according to clinical and radiographic findings.
A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2016 was performed. The databases of PubMed, Índice Médico Español, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched according to the following inclusion criteria: publication language (English or Spanish), adult patients, acalculous etiology and appropriate study design.
A total of 1,013 articles were identified and ten articles were selected for review. These included five observational controlled studies and five case series which described the outcome of patients treated with percutaneous cholecystostomy and emergency cholecystectomy. No prospective or randomized studies were identified using the search criteria. The data from the literature and analysis of results suggested that percutaneous cholecystostomy may be a definitive therapy for acute acalculous cholecystitis with no need for subsequent elective cholecystectomy.
Percutaneous cholecystostomy may be the first treatment option for patients with acute acalculous cholecystitis except in cases with a perforation or gallbladder gangrene. Patients at low surgical risk may benefit from cholecystectomy but both treatment options may be effective. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute acalculous cholecystitis may be a definitive therapy with no need for a subsequent elective cholecystectomy. However, the overall quality of studies is low and the final recommendations should be considered with caution.
目前对于将胆囊切除术或经皮胆囊造瘘术作为急性非结石性胆囊炎的首选治疗方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是根据临床和影像学检查结果,回顾有关这些患者治疗的科学证据。
对2000年至2016年的文献进行系统回顾。根据以下纳入标准检索PubMed、西班牙医学索引、Cochrane图书馆和Embase数据库:出版语言(英语或西班牙语)、成年患者、非结石性病因及适当的研究设计。
共识别出1013篇文章,选取10篇文章进行综述。其中包括5项观察性对照研究和5个病例系列,描述了经皮胆囊造瘘术和急诊胆囊切除术治疗患者的结果。按照检索标准未识别出前瞻性或随机研究。文献数据及结果分析表明,经皮胆囊造瘘术可能是急性非结石性胆囊炎的确定性治疗方法,无需后续择期胆囊切除术。
经皮胆囊造瘘术可能是急性非结石性胆囊炎患者的首选治疗方法,但穿孔或胆囊坏疽病例除外。手术风险低的患者可能从胆囊切除术中获益,但两种治疗方法都可能有效。急性非结石性胆囊炎患者的经皮胆囊造瘘术可能是一种确定性治疗方法,无需后续择期胆囊切除术。然而,研究的总体质量较低,最终建议应谨慎考虑。