Moberly Aaron C, Harris Michael S, Boyce Lauren, Vasil Kara, Wucinich Taylor, Pisoni David B, Baxter Jodi, Ray Christin, Shafiro Valeriy
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):959-966. doi: 10.1002/lary.26791. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Current clinical outcome measures for adults receiving cochlear implants (CIs) consist of word and sentence recognition, primarily under quiet conditions. However, these measures may not adequately reflect patients' CI-specific quality of life (QOL). This study first examined traditional auditory-only speech recognition measures and other potentially relevant auditory measures as correlates of QOL in CI users. Second, scores on nonauditory tasks of language and cognition were examined as potential predictors of QOL.
Twenty-five postlingually deafened adults with CIs were assessed.
Participants completed a validated CI-specific QOL measure (the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire) and were tested for word and sentence recognition in quiet, as well as sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise. Participants also completed assessments of audiovisual speech recognition, environmental sound identification, and a task of complex auditory verbal processing. Several nonauditory language and cognitive tasks were examined as potential predictors of QOL.
Quality-of-life scores significantly correlated with scores for audiovisual speech recognition and recognition of complex sentences in quiet but not sentences in noise or isolated words. No significant correlations were obtained between QOL and environmental sound identification or complex auditory verbal processing. Quality-of-life subdomain scores were predicted by several nonauditory language and cognitive tasks as well as some patient characteristics.
Postoperative measures of recognition of sentences in quiet and audiovisual sentence recognition correlate with CI-related QOL. Findings suggest that sentence recognition tasks are QOL-relevant outcomes but only explain a small fraction of the variability in QOL outcomes for this patient population.
目前针对接受人工耳蜗植入(CI)的成年人的临床结局指标主要包括单词和句子识别,且主要是在安静环境下进行。然而,这些指标可能无法充分反映患者特定于人工耳蜗植入的生活质量(QOL)。本研究首先考察了传统的仅听觉言语识别指标以及其他潜在相关的听觉指标,作为人工耳蜗植入使用者生活质量的相关因素。其次,考察了语言和认知的非听觉任务得分作为生活质量的潜在预测指标。
对25名语后聋的成年人工耳蜗植入者进行评估。
参与者完成了一项经过验证的特定于人工耳蜗植入的生活质量测量(奈梅亨人工耳蜗问卷),并接受了安静环境下的单词和句子识别测试,以及言语噪声中的句子识别测试。参与者还完成了视听言语识别、环境声音识别以及一项复杂听觉言语处理任务的评估。考察了几项非听觉语言和认知任务作为生活质量的潜在预测指标。
生活质量得分与视听言语识别得分以及安静环境下复杂句子的识别得分显著相关,但与噪声中的句子或孤立单词的识别得分无关。生活质量与环境声音识别或复杂听觉言语处理之间未获得显著相关性。生活质量子领域得分由几项非听觉语言和认知任务以及一些患者特征预测。
安静环境下句子识别和视听句子识别的术后测量与人工耳蜗植入相关的生活质量相关。研究结果表明句子识别任务是与生活质量相关的结局,但仅解释了该患者群体生活质量结局变异性的一小部分。
4。《喉镜》,2018年,第128卷,第959 - 966页。