Suppr超能文献

青少年人工耳蜗植入受者的自我报告听力生活质量:一项纵向研究。

Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study.

作者信息

Davidson Lisa S, Geers Ann E, Uchanski Rosalie M, Siu Kathryn

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.

School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 2024 Jul;35(7-08):178-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791212. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians are increasingly interested in self-reported hearing-specific quality of life (HQoL) for cochlear implant (CI) recipients, including pediatric CI recipients.

PURPOSE

(1) To compare HQoL of adolescent CI recipients to those of peers with typical hearing (TH); (2) to examine, longitudinally, HQoL for a set of CI recipients; and (3) to determine the effects of child, demographic, audiological, speech perception, and language variables on adolescent HQoL.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Hearing Environments and Reflections on Quality of Life (HEARQL) questionnaires were completed by children with CIs at elementary (HEARQL-26) and adolescent (HEARQL-28) ages.

STUDY SAMPLE

Eighty CI recipients and 21 children with TH.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

HEARQL-28 scores for the CI and TH groups were compared using nonparametric tests. Regression models were used to examine longitudinal results and to explore predictor variables for adolescent CI participants' HEARQL-28 scores.

RESULTS

HEARQL-28 scores for CI participants were lower than those of peers with TH. For both CI and TH adolescents, the HEARQL subscale with the lowest score is "Hearing Situations." CI participants' HEARQL scores at elementary age were not significantly correlated with scores at adolescence. Over 70% of unexplained variance remains even after inclusion of variables with established contributions to traditional CI benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported HEARQL scores are largely unexplained for pediatric CI recipients; multidisciplinary explorations of other sources of variance, such as social, emotional, and psychosocial factors, should be pursued.

摘要

背景

临床医生越来越关注人工耳蜗(CI)接受者,包括小儿CI接受者自我报告的听力特异性生活质量(HQoL)。

目的

(1)比较青少年CI接受者与听力正常(TH)同龄人的HQoL;(2)纵向研究一组CI接受者的HQoL;(3)确定儿童、人口统计学、听力学、言语感知和语言变量对青少年HQoL的影响。

研究设计

听力环境与生活质量反思(HEARQL)问卷由小学阶段(HEARQL - 26)和青少年阶段(HEARQL - 28)的CI儿童完成。

研究样本

80名CI接受者和21名听力正常儿童。

数据收集与分析

使用非参数检验比较CI组和TH组的HEARQL - 28得分。回归模型用于检验纵向结果,并探索青少年CI参与者HEARQL - 28得分的预测变量。

结果

CI参与者的HEARQL - 28得分低于听力正常的同龄人。对于CI和TH青少年,得分最低的HEARQL子量表是“听力情境”。CI参与者小学阶段的HEARQL得分与青少年阶段的得分无显著相关性。即使纳入了对传统CI益处有既定贡献的变量,仍有超过70%的无法解释的方差存在。

结论

小儿CI接受者自我报告的HEARQL得分在很大程度上无法解释;应开展多学科探索其他方差来源,如社会、情感和心理社会因素。

相似文献

1
Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2024 Jul;35(7-08):178-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791212. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Mar;21(2):83-91. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1670486. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
Spectral Modulation Detection Performance and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Am J Audiol. 2021 Dec 9;30(4):1076-1087. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00076. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
American parent perspectives on quality of life in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
Ear Hear. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):269-78. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000108.
5
Voice Emotion Recognition by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.
Ear Hear. 2022 Jan/Feb;43(1):165-180. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001085.
6
Postlingually deaf adults of all ages derive equal benefits from unilateral multichannel cochlear implant.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(10):637-43. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.10.2.
8
Functional hearing quality in prelingually deaf school-age children and adolescents with cochlear implants.
Int J Audiol. 2021 Apr;60(4):282-292. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1826586. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov;75(11):1418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
10
Factors influencing consistent device use in pediatric recipients of bilateral cochlear implants.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Nov;14(5):257-65. doi: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000026. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Cochlear Implantation and Educational and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Adolescence.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Aug 1;149(8):708-715. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1327.
2
Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Mar;21(2):83-91. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1670486. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):959-966. doi: 10.1002/lary.26791. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
4
Quality of Life in Children with Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug;155(2):208-19. doi: 10.1177/0194599816640485. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
8
Adaptation of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents, and teachers.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Jun;14(3):135-41. doi: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000014.
9
The HEAR-QL: quality of life questionnaire for children with hearing loss.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(10):644-53. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.10.3.
10
Quality of life for children with cochlear implants: perceived benefits and problems and the perception of single words and emotional sounds.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):141-52. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0213). Epub 2008 Jul 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验