• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价中数据提取的增值与减废:数据提取表中的数据追踪。

Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms.

机构信息

Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, The Institute of Mental Health, A Partnership Between The University of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;6(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0546-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0546-z
PMID:28778216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5544999/
Abstract

Data extraction is one of the most time-consuming tasks in performing a systematic review. Extraction is often onto some sort of form. Sharing completed forms can be used to check quality and accuracy of extraction or for re-cycling data to other researchers for updating. However, validating each piece of extracted data is time-consuming and linking to source problematic.In this methodology paper, we summarize three methods for reporting the location of data in original full-text reports, comparing their advantages and disadvantages.

摘要

数据提取是进行系统评价中最耗时的任务之一。提取通常是在某种表格上进行的。共享已完成的表格可用于检查提取的质量和准确性,或用于将数据重新循环用于其他研究人员进行更新。但是,验证提取的每一条数据都非常耗时,而且链接到原始数据也很麻烦。在本方法学论文中,我们总结了三种在原始全文报告中报告数据位置的方法,比较了它们的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b872/5544999/c22085cf32ed/13643_2017_546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b872/5544999/c22085cf32ed/13643_2017_546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b872/5544999/c22085cf32ed/13643_2017_546_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms.系统评价中数据提取的增值与减废:数据提取表中的数据追踪。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;6(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0546-z.
2
PDF text classification to leverage information extraction from publication reports.利用出版物报告中的信息提取进行PDF文本分类。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Jun;61:141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review.系统评价中数据提取的自动化:一项系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;4:78. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0066-7.
4
Response to 'Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms'.对“在系统评价的数据提取中提高价值和减少浪费:在数据提取表格中跟踪数据”的回应。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 25;7(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0677-x.
5
Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort.实时系统评价:2. 整合人工与机器的力量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
6
Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches.在系统评价中使用文本挖掘进行研究识别:当前方法的系统评价
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 14;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-5.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Development of an information retrieval tool for biomedical patents.生物医学专利信息检索工具的开发。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jun;159:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review.系统评价(半)自动化的数据提取方法:一项实时系统评价的更新
F1000Res. 2021 May 19;10:401. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51117.3. eCollection 2021.
10
Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?系统评价中检索研究的方法学发展:过去、现在与未来?
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a comprehensive model of home-based formal care for elderly adults in Iran: A study protocol.制定伊朗老年人家庭式正规护理综合模式:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 8;18(8):e0284462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284462. eCollection 2023.
2
Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report.基于研究的注册减少了系统评价中的浪费:讨论和案例报告。
Syst Rev. 2019 May 30;8(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1035-3.
3
Study-based registers of randomized controlled trials: Starting a systematic review with data extraction or meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Time to consider sharing data extracted from trials included in systematic reviews.是时候考虑分享从纳入系统评价的试验中提取的数据了。
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 3;5(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0361-y.
2
Using built-in functions of Adobe Acrobat Pro DC to help the selection process in systematic reviews of randomised trials.使用Adobe Acrobat Pro DC的内置功能辅助随机试验系统评价中的筛选过程。
Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 18;5:33. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0207-7.
3
A case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selection.
基于研究的随机对照试验注册库:从数据提取或荟萃分析开始进行系统评价。
Bioimpacts. 2017;7(4):209-217. doi: 10.15171/bi.2017.25. Epub 2017 Sep 17.
4
Response to 'Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms'.对“在系统评价的数据提取中提高价值和减少浪费:在数据提取表格中跟踪数据”的回应。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 25;7(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0677-x.
一项关于髋关节置换术三项系统评价中二元结局数据提取的案例研究:选择的错误与差异
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Dec 17;6:539. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-539.
4
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews.在系统评价中,单数据提取比双数据提取产生的错误更多。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;59(7):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.010. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
5
High prevalence but low impact of data extraction and reporting errors were found in Cochrane systematic reviews.在Cochrane系统评价中发现数据提取和报告错误的发生率很高,但影响较小。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jul;58(7):741-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.11.024. Epub 2005 Apr 18.