Xu Chun-Xiao, Zhu Hong-Hong, Fang Le, Hu Ru-Ying, Wang Hao, Liang Ming-Bin, Zhang Jie, Lu Feng, He Qin-Fang, Wang Li-Xin, Chen Xiang-Yu, Du Xiao-Fu, Yu Min, Zhong Jie-Ming
Department of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases Control and Prevention, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Preventive Medicine Institute, Louisiana, MO, USA.
J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):401-407. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.08.019. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
The associations of occupational activity (OA), commuting, leisure-time physical activity (LTPA), and sitting with overweight/obesity in working adults are controversial. This study explored these factors with the risk of overall and abdominal overweight/obesity in a Chinese working population and whether these associations differ by gender.
A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data analysis was done among 6739 employed participants. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the studied associations.
For male employees, those with heavy OA had a lower overall (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93) and abdominal (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93) overweight/obesity risk than those with light OA. Those with LTPA ≥150 min/week had a lower risk of overall (OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96) and abdominal (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91) overweight/obesity than those with LTPA <150 min/week. Men with leisure-sitting time <2.5 h/day had a significantly lower risk of abdominal overweight/obesity than those sitting ≥4 h/day (OR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99). And men who cycled to/from work had a lower risk of overall (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90) and abdominal overweight/obesity (OR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54-0.92) than passive transports. However, the above significant associations disappeared among female employees.
Heavy OA, cycling to/from work, and LTPA were associated with lower risk of overall or abdominal overweight/obesity in male employees. Reducing leisure sitting time can also help male employees reduce the risk of abdominal overweight/obesity. More research on gender disparity in the risk of overweight and obesity should be done.
职业活动(OA)、通勤、休闲时间体力活动(LTPA)以及久坐与在职成年人超重/肥胖之间的关联存在争议。本研究探讨了这些因素与中国在职人群总体及腹部超重/肥胖风险的关系,以及这些关联是否因性别而异。
进行了一项横断面研究。对6739名在职参与者进行了数据分析。采用多因素逻辑回归来估计所研究关联的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
对于男性员工,从事高强度职业活动的人相比从事低强度职业活动的人,总体超重/肥胖风险更低(OR 0.76;95%CI,0.62 - 0.93),腹部超重/肥胖风险也更低(OR 0.76;95%CI,0.62 - 0.93)。每周休闲时间体力活动≥150分钟的人相比每周休闲时间体力活动<150分钟的人,总体超重/肥胖风险更低(OR 0.73;95%CI,0.56 - 0.96),腹部超重/肥胖风险也更低(OR 0.70;95%CI,0.53 - 0.91)。休闲久坐时间<2.5小时/天的男性相比久坐≥4小时/天的男性,腹部超重/肥胖风险显著更低(OR 0.80;95%CI,0.65 - 0.99)。而且上下班骑自行车的男性相比采用被动交通方式的男性,总体超重/肥胖风险更低(OR 0.69;95%CI,0.53 - 0.90),腹部超重/肥胖风险也更低(OR 0.71;95%CI,0.54 - 0.92)。然而,上述显著关联在女性员工中消失。
高强度职业活动、上下班骑自行车以及休闲时间体力活动与男性员工总体或腹部超重/肥胖风险较低相关。减少休闲久坐时间也有助于男性员工降低腹部超重/肥胖风险。应针对超重和肥胖风险中的性别差异开展更多研究。