Department of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
School of Clinical Sciences and School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Physiotherapy. 2018 Mar;104(1):136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
To validate the Rehabilitation Adherence Measure for Athletic Training (RAdMAT) for use in clinic-based physiotherapy.
Single group, prospective study conducted over the course of the participants' rehabilitation. Clinic-based adherence was measured by participant attendance at physiotherapy appointments, the 16-item RAdMAT (three subscales) and the three-item SIRAS questionnaire. The SIRAS was evaluated after each physiotherapy treatment and the RAdMAT either at the completion of their treatment or at end of the eight week study period. Both questionnaires were completed by the physiotherapist.
108 participants with soft tissue injuries of the shoulder.
The percentage of adherence for the three different adherence measures was high ranging from 89% to 95%. Large significant correlations were found between the SIRAS and the RAdMAT total score, and the RAdMAT factor 1; and amongst the RAdMAT total and its three subscales. Medium strength correlations existed between the SIRAS and the other two RAdMAT subscales. Small significant correlations occurred between percentage of attendance, and RAdMAT factors 2 and 3.
The strength of the correlations between the RAdMAT and the SIRAS provide evidence for the RAdMAT and its three subscales comprising a valid and comprehensive assessment tool for measuring patient adherence to clinic-based physiotherapy. Registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12612000611820).
验证康复依从性测量表在临床物理治疗中的适用性。
采用单组前瞻性研究,在参与者康复过程中进行。通过参与者参加物理治疗预约、16 项康复依从性测量表(三个分量表)和三项目顺从性评定量表的方式来衡量临床依从性。顺从性评定量表在每次物理治疗后进行评估,康复依从性测量表在治疗结束时或八周研究结束时进行评估。两个问卷均由物理治疗师完成。
108 名肩部软组织损伤患者。
三种不同依从性测量方法的依从率均较高,范围为 89%至 95%。顺从性评定量表与康复依从性测量表总分和因子 1之间,以及康复依从性测量表总分与其三个分量表之间存在显著的强相关性。顺从性评定量表与其他两个康复依从性测量表分量表之间存在中等强度的相关性。出勤率与康复依从性测量表因子 2 和因子 3之间存在小的显著相关性。
康复依从性测量表与顺从性评定量表之间的相关性强度为其提供了证据,表明康复依从性测量表及其三个分量表构成了一种有效和全面的评估工具,用于衡量患者对临床物理治疗的依从性。该研究已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12612000611820)注册。