Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland; European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017 Oct;8(6):872-877. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and Lyme borreliosis (LB) are endemic in Finland, with tens and thousands of cases, respectively, reported annually. We performed a field survey to investigate people's knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding ticks, tick-borne diseases, and prevention strategies. The KAP were assessed using a pre-validated anonymous questionnaire consisting of 39 questions and statements. On two consecutive days in July 2016, convenience sampling was used in the cities of Parainen and Kotka, located in high-risk areas of tick-borne diseases, particularly of TBE. In attitudes and practices sections, each question was scored and analysed with ordered logistic regression model. In total, 101 individuals responded. The TBE vaccination rate among respondents was 40%. The best known preventive measures were having vaccination against TBE (88%), and wearing long sleeves and pants against ticks (81%). Two-thirds incorrectly identified the ring-like rash as a symptom of TBE. Of all respondents, 78% could not exclude that TBE can be treated with antibiotics; 55% that vaccine protects against LB; and 46% that it protects against ticks. The minority (14%) believed tick repellents to be effective. Among preventive behaviour, the quick removal of an attached tick was most frequently applied (97%). Repellents were used by 21% when visiting tick-infested areas. Significant associations were found between the vaccination status and having a correct belief that the vaccine protects against TBE (P<0.001) but not against ticks (P<0.05), or LB (P<0.001). KAP is a quick and easy tool to get a rough estimation on people's awareness regarding ticks and tick-borne diseases. We identified gaps in knowledge and misbeliefs. Our results can be used in public health communication tools on tick-borne diseases, especially those on intervention strategies.
在芬兰,蜱传脑炎(TBE)和莱姆病(LB)流行,每年报告的病例分别达到数万例。我们进行了一项实地调查,以了解人们对蜱、蜱传疾病和预防策略的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。KAP 使用预先验证的匿名问卷进行评估,问卷包含 39 个问题和陈述。2016 年 7 月的两天,在蜱传疾病高风险地区的 Parainen 和 Kotka 市进行了便利抽样。在态度和实践部分,对每个问题进行评分,并使用有序逻辑回归模型进行分析。共有 101 人回答。受访者中 TBE 疫苗接种率为 40%。最知名的预防措施是接种 TBE 疫苗(88%)和穿长袖长裤防蜱(81%)。三分之二的人错误地将环形皮疹识别为 TBE 的症状。所有受访者中,78%的人不能排除 TBE 可以用抗生素治疗;55%的人认为疫苗可以预防 LB;46%的人认为疫苗可以预防蜱。少数人(14%)认为驱虫剂有效。在预防行为中,最常采用的是快速去除附着的蜱(97%)。当访问蜱虫出没的地区时,有 21%的人使用驱虫剂。疫苗接种状况与正确的信念(P<0.001),即疫苗可以预防 TBE 而不是蜱(P<0.05)或 LB(P<0.001)之间存在显著相关性。KAP 是一种快速简便的工具,可以粗略估计人们对蜱和蜱传疾病的认识。我们发现了知识差距和误解。我们的结果可用于蜱传疾病的公共卫生传播工具,特别是干预策略方面。