Suppr超能文献

报告了一起或多起与工作相关的伤害的美国家庭保健助手的职业伤害决定因素。

Determinants of occupational injury for US home health aides reporting one or more work-related injuries.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Department of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2018 Oct;24(5):351-357. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042449. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Home health aides (HHAs) work in a high-risk industry and experience high rates of work-related injury that have been significantly associated with reduction in workers and organisational productivity, quality and performance. The main objective of the study was to examine how worker environment and ergonomic factors affect HHA risk for reporting occupational injuries.

METHOD

We used cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2007 National Home Health and Hospice Aide Survey (NHHAS). The study sample consisted of a nationally represented sample of home health aides (n=3.377) with a 76.6% response rate. We used two scales : a Work Environment Scale and an Ergonomic Scale. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted to describe HHA work-related injury across individual, job and organisational factors. To measure scale reliability, Cronbach's alphas were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of reported occupational injury.

RESULTS

In terms of Work Environment Scale, the injury risk was decreased in HHAs who did not consistently care for the same patients (OR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.73). In terms of Ergonomic Scale, the injury risk was decreased only in HHAs who reported not needing any other devices for job safety (OR=0.30, 95% (CI): 0.15 to 0.61). No other Work Environment or Ergonomic Scale factors were associated with HHAs' risk of injury.

CONCLUSION

This study has great implications on a subcategory of the workforce that has a limited amount of published work and studies, as of today, as well as an anticipated large demand for them.

摘要

目的

家庭保健助手(HHAs)在高风险行业工作,其工作相关伤害率很高,这与工人和组织的生产力、质量和绩效下降有很大关系。本研究的主要目的是研究工作环境和人体工程学因素如何影响 HHA 报告职业伤害的风险。

方法

我们使用 2007 年全国家庭保健和临终关怀助手调查(NHHAS)的数据进行了横断面分析。研究样本包括具有 76.6%回复率的全国代表性家庭保健助手(n=3377)。我们使用了两个量表:工作环境量表和人体工程学量表。进行了单变量和双变量分析,以描述与个体、工作和组织因素相关的 HHA 工作相关伤害。为了衡量量表的可靠性,计算了 Cronbach 的 alpha 值。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定报告的职业伤害的预测因素。

结果

就工作环境量表而言,持续照顾同一患者的 HHAs 受伤风险降低(OR=0.96,95%CI:0.53 至 1.73)。就人体工程学量表而言,仅报告不需要任何其他设备来确保工作安全的 HHAs 的受伤风险降低(OR=0.30,95%CI:0.15 至 0.61)。其他工作环境或人体工程学量表因素与 HHA 受伤风险无关。

结论

这项研究对今天为止,在已发表的工作和研究数量有限的劳动力亚类以及对他们的预期大量需求具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验