Suppr超能文献

聚醚和聚硫化物材料某些性能的比较。

Comparison of some properties of polyether and polysulfide materials.

作者信息

Nayyar A, Tomlins C D, Fairhurst C W, Okabe T

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1979 Aug;42(2):163-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90167-7.

Abstract

Based on the present measurements on working time, setting time, and compression set of polyether and polysulfide materials, the following observations were made: 1. The manufacturer recommends a working time for polyether that is approximately 40 seconds more than that indicated by the clinical or ADA test. 2. Clinically, if more working time is desired, polysulfide impression material should be used. 3. Polysulfide material is more sensitive to temperature change than the polyether material. 4. If the material is allowed to set longer, the percentage change in compression set decreases. 5. For polyether, an increase in setting time of 2 minutes will significantly reduce the distortion of the impression upon removal.

摘要

基于目前对聚醚和聚硫化物材料的工作时间、凝固时间及压缩永久变形的测量,得出以下观察结果:1. 制造商推荐的聚醚工作时间比临床或ADA测试所表明的时间约长40秒。2. 在临床上,如果需要更长的工作时间,应使用聚硫化物印模材料。3. 聚硫化物材料比聚醚材料对温度变化更敏感。4. 如果材料凝固时间更长,压缩永久变形的百分比变化会减小。5. 对于聚醚,凝固时间增加2分钟将显著减少取出印模时的变形。

相似文献

4
Linear dimensional changes in elastic impression materials.弹性印模材料的线性尺寸变化
J Dent Res. 1980 Jul;59(7):1152-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345800590071001.
6
Tear strength of elastomeric impression materials.
J Prosthet Dent. 1978 Jan;39(1):59-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(78)80048-1.
9
Tissue conditioners as functional impression materials.
J Oral Rehabil. 1978 Oct;5(4):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01254.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验