Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):44-46. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103996. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
This paper considers the meaning of the term 'intrusive research', as used in the UK Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), in relation to studies in which an informant is asked to provide information about or on behalf of a person who lacks capacity to consent, and who is not otherwise involved in the study. The MCA defines 'intrusive research' as research that would legally require consent if it involved people with capacity. The relevant ethical principles are that consent should be sought from people who would be affected by a piece of research and that this requirement should be implemented proportionately. The critical question, for investigators and research ethics committees, is: would provision of the personal information specified in the research protocol significantly affect a person whose capacity is not impaired? If the answer to this question is 'no', then the study falls outside the definition of 'intrusive research', and the MCA does not apply.
本文考虑了在英国 2005 年《精神能力法案》(MCA)中使用的“侵入性研究”一词的含义,该词涉及到要求知情人提供有关缺乏同意能力的人的信息,而该人并未参与研究的情况。MCA 将“侵入性研究”定义为如果涉及有能力的人,则法律上需要同意的研究。相关的伦理原则是,应该从受研究影响的人那里征求同意,并且应该按比例实施这一要求。对于研究人员和研究伦理委员会来说,关键问题是:研究方案中规定的个人信息的提供是否会对能力未受损的人产生重大影响?如果对这个问题的回答是“否”,那么该研究不属于“侵入性研究”的定义范围,MCA 也不适用。