Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey.
J Clin Densitom. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between fracture risk predictions based on calculations made with and without bone mineral density (BMD) values using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) in Turkish postmenopausal women with osteopenia and to compare the treatment recommendations. This descriptive, cross-sectional study included postmenopausal women aged 50-79 yr with a diagnosis of osteoporosis who were not receiving any treatment. A questionnaire was administered to the participants face-to-face to obtain sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and fracture history. Fracture risk was calculated with FRAX® separately with and without BMD. The study included 230 postmenopausal patients with osteopenia. The mean age of the patients was determined as 63.16 ± 7.59 yr, and the mean body mass index was 30.61 ± 5.02. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the 10-yr major osteoporotic (MO) fracture and hip fracture score agreement with FRAX® with and without BMD were mean 0.486 and 0.462, respectively. The risk of MO fracture with an intervention threshold of ≥20 was determined in 227/230 patients (98.7%), and the risk of hip fracture with treatment recommendations of ≥3 was determined in 204/230 patients (88.7%). Treatment recommendations in patients with no fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were 100% for MO fracture and 94.7% (123/130) for hip fracture risk. The treatment recommendation rates of FRAX® with and without BMD were similar for the majority of postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The agreement between the values was of a moderate level. When patients with a fracture history and secondary osteoporosis were excluded, the agreement increased. Even though values with BMD are of basic importance for medical treatment in postmenopausal women, the use of measurements evaluating fracture risk, such as FRAX® without BMD, could be useful in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
本研究旨在评估土耳其绝经后骨质疏松症伴骨量减少患者使用 FRAX®(骨折风险评估工具)基于有无骨密度(BMD)值计算的骨折风险预测之间的一致性,并比较治疗建议。这是一项描述性、横断面研究,纳入了年龄在 50-79 岁、未接受任何治疗且诊断为骨质疏松症的绝经后女性。通过面对面的问卷调查,获取参与者的社会人口统计学特征、病史和骨折史。分别使用 FRAX®和不使用 BMD 单独计算骨折风险。该研究共纳入 230 例绝经后骨质疏松症伴骨量减少患者。患者的平均年龄为 63.16±7.59 岁,平均体重指数为 30.61±5.02。FRAX®有无 BMD 的 10 年主要骨质疏松性(MO)骨折和髋部骨折评分的组内相关系数值分别为 0.486 和 0.462。在 230 例患者中,有 227 例(98.7%)的 MO 骨折干预阈值≥20,有 204 例(88.7%)的髋部骨折治疗建议阈值≥3。无骨折史和继发性骨质疏松症患者的 MO 骨折治疗建议率为 100%,髋部骨折风险为 94.7%(123/130)。大多数绝经后骨质疏松症伴骨量减少患者的 FRAX®有无 BMD 的治疗建议率相似。两种方法之间的一致性为中度水平。当排除有骨折史和继发性骨质疏松症的患者时,一致性增加。尽管 BMD 对绝经后女性的医疗治疗具有基本重要性,但使用 FRAX®等不依赖 BMD 的评估骨折风险的测量方法可能对绝经后骨质疏松症伴骨量减少的患者有用。