University Hospitals Sports Medicine Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):753-758. doi: 10.1177/0363546517718513. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
Coracoid fractures sustained during sporting activities are rare. Previous reports are limited to individual case reports, small case series, and retrospective analyses.
To systematically review the literature and identify coracoid fractures sustained during sporting activities to determine fracture prevalence, sporting activities/mechanisms, management, and time to return to sport.
Systematic review.
A systematic review was conducted investigating all studies in the literature published between January 1970 and April 2017 that reported on athletes sustaining coracoid fractures during sporting activity. The systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and used PubMed, Biosis Previews, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were studies detailing (1) coracoid fractures with reported sporting activity causing injury, (2) fracture management (operative vs nonoperative), and (3) patient outcome. Exclusion criteria were (1) studies concerning fractures secondary to nonsporting activities (mechanical falls, motor vehicle accidents) and (2) studies not reporting fracture management or patient outcomes. Sporting activities, the presence or absence of associated acromioclavicular (AC) joint injury, fracture management, patient outcomes, and time to return to sport were analyzed.
A total of 21 cases of coracoid fractures sustained during sporting activity were identified; acute trauma was responsible for 71% (n = 15/21) of fractures, and the remaining injuries were secondary to fatigue fractures. Concurrent AC joint injury was present in 60% (n = 9/15) of athletes sustaining acute trauma and in no athlete with fatigue fractures. Fractures were treated conservatively in 76% (n = 16/21) of patients, with only 19% (n = 3/16) of athletes reporting complications. Mean overall time to return to sport was 2.8 ± 2.0 months; no significant differences in return to sport were noted in athletes with traumatic versus fatigue fractures or those with or without AC joint injury.
Coracoid fractures secondary to sporting activities are rare, occurring primarily from direct trauma with associated AC joint injury, and are treated successfully with nonoperative management. No difference in return to sport was found regardless of fracture mechanism, treatment, or the presence of associated AC joint injury.
运动中发生的喙突骨折较为罕见。既往报道局限于个别病例报告、小病例系列和回顾性分析。
系统回顾文献,确定运动中发生的喙突骨折,以明确骨折发生率、运动/机制、处理方法和重返运动时间。
系统回顾。
系统检索了 1970 年 1 月至 2017 年 4 月间文献中所有报道运动员在运动中发生喙突骨折的研究。系统回顾遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,使用了 PubMed、Biosis Previews、SPORTDiscus、PEDro 和 EMBASE 数据库。纳入标准为详细描述(1)与运动相关的喙突骨折,(2)骨折处理(手术与非手术),(3)患者结局的研究。排除标准为(1)非运动相关活动(机械性跌倒、机动车事故)导致的骨折的研究,(2)未报告骨折处理或患者结局的研究。分析运动类型、有无肩锁关节(AC)关节损伤、骨折处理、患者结局和重返运动时间。
共确定了 21 例运动中发生的喙突骨折;急性创伤导致了 71%(n=15/21)的骨折,其余损伤为疲劳性骨折。急性创伤所致骨折中 60%(n=9/15)合并 AC 关节损伤,而无疲劳性骨折患者存在该损伤。76%(n=16/21)的患者采用保守治疗,仅 19%(n=3/16)的患者报告出现并发症。总体重返运动时间的平均时间为 2.8±2.0 个月;在创伤性骨折与疲劳性骨折、或伴或不伴 AC 关节损伤的患者之间,重返运动时间无显著差异。
运动引起的喙突骨折较为罕见,主要由直接创伤合并 AC 关节损伤引起,采用非手术治疗可获得成功。无论骨折机制、处理方法或是否合并 AC 关节损伤,重返运动时间均无差异。